Literature DB >> 16628369

Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions.

Cezary Biele1, Anna Grabowska.   

Abstract

Most research on the perception of emotional expressions is conducted using static faces as stimuli. However, facial displays of emotion are a highly dynamic phenomenon and a static photograph is its very unnatural representation. The goal of the present research was to assess the role of stimuli dynamics as well as subjects' sex in the perception of emotional expressions. In the experiment, subjects rated the intensity of expressions of anger and happiness presented as photographs (static stimuli) and animations (dynamic stimuli). The impact of both stimulus dynamics and emotion type on the perceived intensity was observed. The emotions on 'angry faces' were judged as more intense than on 'happy faces' and the intensity ratings were higher in the case of animation rather than photography. Moreover, gender differences in the rated intensity were found. For male subjects higher intensity ratings for dynamic than for static expressions were noted in the case of anger, whereas in the case of happiness, no differences were observed. For female subjects, however, differences for both anger and happiness were significant. The results suggest that the dynamic characteristic of facial display is an important factor in the perception of the intensity of emotional expressions. Its effect, however, depends on the subjects' sex and emotional valence.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16628369     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0254-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks.

Authors:  H L Gallagher; F Happé; N Brunswick; P C Fletcher; U Frith; C D Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Sex-specific developmental changes in amygdala responses to affective faces.

Authors:  W D Killgore; M Oki; D A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: a multivariate analysis of recognition errors.

Authors:  J F Thayer; B H Johnsen
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2000-09

Review 4.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas.

Authors:  E T Rolls
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expressions of emotion: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Sakiko Yoshikawa; Eiichi Naito; Michikazu Matsumura
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-06

6.  Lateralised processing of positive facial emotion: sex differences in strength of hemispheric dominance.

Authors:  Victoria J Bourne
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions.

Authors:  Zara Ambadar; Jonathan W Schooler; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-05

8.  Sex differences in asymmetrically perceiving the intensity of facial expressions.

Authors:  W D Killgore; S W Gangestad
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1999-08

9.  Accuracy of facial affect recognition as a function of locus of control orientation and anticipated interpersonal interaction.

Authors:  S Nowicki; M Hartigan
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

10.  Perceptual skill in decoding facial affect.

Authors:  M K Mandal; S Palchoudhury
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1985-02
View more
  49 in total

1.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Functional connections between activated and deactivated brain regions mediate emotional interference during externally directed cognition.

Authors:  Simone Di Plinio; Francesca Ferri; Laura Marzetti; Gian Luca Romani; Georg Northoff; Vittorio Pizzella
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Facial Expression Enhances Emotion Perception Compared to Vocal Prosody: Behavioral and fMRI Studies.

Authors:  Heming Zhang; Xuhai Chen; Shengdong Chen; Yansong Li; Changming Chen; Quanshan Long; Jiajin Yuan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Influence of gender in the recognition of basic facial expressions: A critical literature review.

Authors:  Larissa Forni-Santos; Flávia L Osório
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-22

5.  Infant Smiling Dynamics and Perceived Positive Emotion.

Authors:  Daniel S Messinger; Tricia D Cassel; Susan I Acosta; Zara Ambadar; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2008-09-01

6.  Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Barbra Zupan; Dawn Neumann
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Face-Processing Performance is an Independent Predictor of Social Affect as Measured by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Across Large-Scale Datasets.

Authors:  Ivry Zagury-Orly; Mallory R Kroeck; Louis Soussand; Alexander Li Cohen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-03-20

8.  The perception of dynamic and static facial expressions of happiness and disgust investigated by ERPs and fMRI constrained source analysis.

Authors:  Sina Alexa Trautmann-Lengsfeld; Judith Domínguez-Borràs; Carles Escera; Manfred Herrmann; Thorsten Fehr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of ethnic group-membership and gaze direction on the perception of emotions. A cross-cultural study between Germany and China.

Authors:  Katharina Krämer; Gary Bente; Siyang Luo; Ulrich J Pfeiffer; Shihui Han; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Ivana Pavlovic; Nicola Jordan; Pascal Suter; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.