Literature DB >> 16622626

Evaluation of possible prostate displacement induced by pressure applied during transabdominal ultrasound image acquisition.

Barbara Dobler1, Sabine Mai, Christine Ross, Dirk Wolff, Hansjörg Wertz, Frank Lohr, Frederik Wenz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: For accurate positioning of the prostate in external radiotherapy, transabdominal ultrasound localization and positioning systems are available. Reports have stated that probe pressure applied during image acquisition causes clinically relevant prostate displacement. The aim of this study was to investigate the prostate displacement due to the pressure applied during transabdominal ultrasound image acquisition with the BAT ultrasound system.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: For ten patients who had undergone iodine-125 seed implantation for brachytherapy of prostate cancer, X-ray simulations were performed before and during ultrasound image acquisition. The iodine seeds are visible on the X-ray images, representing the position of the prostate. The simulator's crosshair, indicating the isocenter, was used as reference coordinate system. For each patient the change in prostate position was calculated based on the seed positions during and after ultrasound examination.
RESULTS: A maximum displacement of the prostate of 2.3 mm in anteroposterior and 1.9 mm in craniocaudal direction and a rotational change of up to 2.5 degrees were observed. If the system was not handled correctly and too much pressure was applied, a shift of the prostate of up to 10 mm could be induced.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the prostate displacement due to changes in rectal filling, which according to Crook et al. can be as much as 1.7 cm, the maximum displacement of less than 0.3 cm caused by the probe pressure is negligible. However, proper education of the staff and preparation of the patient are essential for the safe use of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622626     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-006-1513-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  16 in total

1.  Exposure of treating physician to radiation during prostate brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds: dose measurements on both hands with thermoluminescence dosimeters.

Authors:  Hans Schiefer; Friedrich von Toggenburg; Wolf Seelentag; Ludwig Plasswilm; Gerhard Ries; Cornelius Lenggenhager; Hans-Peter Schmid; Thomas Leippold; Ladislav Prikler; Bernd Krusche; Jakob Roth; Daniel Engeler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Prefraction displacement and intrafraction drift of the prostate due to perineal ultrasound probe pressure.

Authors:  Minglun Li; Nina-Sophie Hegemann; Farkhad Manapov; Anne Kolberg; Patrick Dominik Thum; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka; Hendrik Ballhausen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT.

Authors:  Minglun Li; Hendrik Ballhausen; Nina-Sophie Hegemann; Michael Reiner; Stefan Tritschler; Christian Gratzke; Farkhad Manapov; Stefanie Corradini; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dose escalation in prostate radiotherapy up to 82 Gy using simultaneous integrated boost: direct comparison of acute and late toxicity with 3D-CRT 74 Gy and IMRT 78 Gy.

Authors:  Martin Dolezel; Karel Odrazka; Miloslava Vaculikova; Jaroslav Vanasek; Jana Sefrova; Petr Paluska; Milan Zouhar; Jan Jansa; Zuzana Macingova; Lida Jarosova; Milos Brodak; Petr Moravek; Igor Hartmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  A data-driven soft sensor for needle deflection in heterogeneous tissue using just-in-time modelling.

Authors:  Carlos Rossa; Thomas Lehmann; Ronald Sloboda; Nawaid Usmani; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Dosimetric comparison of image guidance by megavoltage computed tomography versus bone alignment for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jörn Kalz; Florian Sterzing; Kai Schubert; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Intra-fractional uncertainties in image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Buelent Polat; Iris Guenther; Juergen Wilbert; Joachim Goebel; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Reduced rectal toxicity with ultrasound-based image guided radiotherapy using BAT (B-mode acquisition and targeting system) for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Markus Bohrer; Peter Schröder; Grit Welzel; Hansjörg Wertz; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Sabine Kathrin Mai
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Implementation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for the analysis of inter- and intrafraction organ motion.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Martin Pursch-Lee; Branka Asadpour; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  IMRT of prostate cancer: a comparison of fluence optimization with sequential segmentation and direct step-and-shoot optimization.

Authors:  Marius Treutwein; Matthias Hipp; Oliver Kölbl; Ludwig Bogner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.