Literature DB >> 28197655

Prefraction displacement and intrafraction drift of the prostate due to perineal ultrasound probe pressure.

Minglun Li1, Nina-Sophie Hegemann1, Farkhad Manapov1, Anne Kolberg1, Patrick Dominik Thum1, Ute Ganswindt1, Claus Belka1, Hendrik Ballhausen2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In image-guided EBRT of the prostate, transperineal ultrasound (US) probes exert pressure on the perineum both during planning and treatment. Through tissue deformation and relaxation, this causes target and risk organ displacement and drift. In this study, prefraction shift and intrafraction drift of the prostate are quantified during robotic transperineal 4DUS.
METHODS: The position of the prostate was recorded for different positions of the probe before treatment in 10 patients (16 series of measurements). During treatment (15 patients, 273 fractions), intrafraction motion of the prostate was tracked (total of 27 h and 24 min) with the transperineal probe in place.
RESULTS: Per 1 mm shift of the US probe in the cranial direction, a displacement of the prostate by 0.42 ± 0.09 mm in the cranial direction was detected. The relationship was found to be linear (R² = 0.97) and highly significant (p < 0.0001). After initial contact of the probe and the perineum (no pressure), a shift of the probe of about 5-10 mm was typically necessary to achieve good image quality, corresponding to a shift of the prostate of about 2-4 mm in the cranial direction. Tissue compression and prostate displacement were well visible. During treatment, the prostate drifted at an average rate of 0.075 mm/min in the cranial direction (p = 0.0014).
CONCLUSION: The pressure applied by a perineal US probe has a quantitatively similar impact on prostate displacement as transabdominal pressure. Shifts are predominantly in the cranial direction (typically 2-4 mm) with some component in the anterior direction (typically <1 mm). Slight probe pressure can improve image quality, but excessive probe pressure can distort the surrounding anatomy and potentially move risk organs closer to the high-dose area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External beam radiotherapy; Intrafraction motion; Patient positioning; Quality assurance; Transperineal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28197655     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1105-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  12 in total

1.  Correction of probe pressure artifacts in freehand 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  G M Treece; R W Prager; A H Gee; L Berman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Ultrasound probe pressure as a source of error in prostate localization for external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  John P McGahan; Janice Ryu; Maria Fogata
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  RF and amplitude-based probe pressure correction for 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Richard W Prager
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Evaluation of a three-dimensional ultrasound localisation system incorporating probe pressure correction for use in partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  E J Harris; R Symonds-Taylor; G M Treece; A H Gee; R W Prager; P Brabants; P M Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Linearity of patient positioning detection : a phantom study of skin markers, cone beam computed tomography, and 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  Hendrik Ballhausen; Sheila Hieber; Minglun Li; Katia Parodi; Claus Belka; Michael Reiner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Technical Note: Millimeter precision in ultrasound based patient positioning: experimental quantification of inherent technical limitations.

Authors:  Hendrik Ballhausen; Sheila Hieber; Minglun Li; Claus Belka; Michael Reiner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marie Fargier-Voiron; Benoît Presles; Pascal Pommier; Simon Rit; Alexandre Munoz; Hervé Liebgott; David Sarrut; Marie-Claude Biston
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  A study to quantify the effectiveness of daily endorectal balloon for prostate intrafraction motion management.

Authors:  Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Neha Vapiwala; Curtiland Deville; John P Plastaras; Ryan Scheuermann; Haibo Lin; Voika Bar Ad; Zelig Tochner; Stefan Both
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A comparative assessment of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional ultrasound and cone beam CT.

Authors:  Minglun Li; Hendrik Ballhausen; Nina-Sophie Hegemann; Ute Ganswindt; Farkhad Manapov; Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Roosen; Christian Gratzke; Michael Reiner; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Surface refraction of sound waves affects calibration of three-dimensional ultrasound.

Authors:  Hendrik Ballhausen; Bianca Désirée Ballhausen; Martin Lachaine; Minglun Li; Katia Parodi; Claus Belka; Michael Reiner
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  6 in total

1.  Shorter treatment times reduce the impact of intra-fractional motion : A real-time 4DUS study comparing VMAT vs. step-and-shoot IMRT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hendrik Ballhausen; Minglun Li; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Distance Between the Tumour and Nipple as a Predictor of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jiqiao Yang; Qianru Yang; Arjudeb Mukherjee; Qing Lv
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  The ProMotion LMU dataset (2022 edition), prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.

Authors:  Hendrik Ballhausen; Elena Kortmann; Claus Belka; Minglun Li
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 8.501

4.  Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy.

Authors:  Kalani De Silva; Amy Brown; Christopher Edwards
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-08-27

Review 5.  The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Saskia M Camps; Davide Fontanarosa; Peter H N de With; Frank Verhaegen; Ben G L Vanneste
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The ProMotion LMU dataset, prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.

Authors:  Hendrik Ballhausen; Minglun Li; Claus Belka
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.444

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.