BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to determine (1) whether community optometrists are able to make valid measurements of visual parameters in patients with established or suspect primary open angle glaucoma and (2) patient satisfaction with follow-up by community optometrists. METHODS: A randomized study was carried out in the former county of Avon in South West England with patients allocated to follow-up by the hospital eye service or by community optometrists. The subjects were 403 patients with established or suspected primary open angle glaucoma attending Bristol Eye Hospital and meeting defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main outcome measures were 91) measurements of key visual parameters (intraocular pressure, visual fields and cup/disc ratio) made by hospital eye service and community optometrists, compared with a research clinic reference standard at baseline, and (2) patient satisfaction at baseline and at six months. RESULTS: Community optometrists were able to make measurements of comparable accuracy to those made in the hospital eye service. Patients were significantly more satisfied with a number of aspects of care provided by community optometrists, particularly those relating to waiting times, compared with those from the hospital eye service. CONCLUSIONS: Community optometrists are able to make measurements of key visual parameters in patients with established or suspect primary open angle glaucoma which are of comparable quality to the hospital eye service. Follow-up by community optometrists is acceptable to patients. The costs of each option are reported elsewhere.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to determine (1) whether community optometrists are able to make valid measurements of visual parameters in patients with established or suspect primary open angle glaucoma and (2) patient satisfaction with follow-up by community optometrists. METHODS: A randomized study was carried out in the former county of Avon in South West England with patients allocated to follow-up by the hospital eye service or by community optometrists. The subjects were 403 patients with established or suspected primary open angle glaucoma attending Bristol Eye Hospital and meeting defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main outcome measures were 91) measurements of key visual parameters (intraocular pressure, visual fields and cup/disc ratio) made by hospital eye service and community optometrists, compared with a research clinic reference standard at baseline, and (2) patient satisfaction at baseline and at six months. RESULTS: Community optometrists were able to make measurements of comparable accuracy to those made in the hospital eye service. Patients were significantly more satisfied with a number of aspects of care provided by community optometrists, particularly those relating to waiting times, compared with those from the hospital eye service. CONCLUSIONS: Community optometrists are able to make measurements of key visual parameters in patients with established or suspect primary open angle glaucoma which are of comparable quality to the hospital eye service. Follow-up by community optometrists is acceptable to patients. The costs of each option are reported elsewhere.
Authors: S F Gray; P G Spry; S T Brookes; T J Peters; I C Spencer; I A Baker; J M Sparrow; D L Easty Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: P G Spry; I C Spencer; J M Sparrow; T J Peters; S T Brookes; S Gray; I Baker; J E Furber; D L Easty Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Kim M Holtzer-Goor; Esther van Sprundel; Hans G Lemij; Thomas Plochg; Niek S Klazinga; Marc A Koopmanschap Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kim M Holtzer-Goor; Thomas Plochg; Hans G Lemij; Esther van Sprundel; Marc A Koopmanschap; Niek S Klazinga Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 7.327