Literature DB >> 16621873

Tissue Doppler velocity is superior to displacement and strain mapping in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling response after cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

C-M Yu1, Q Zhang, Y-S Chan, C-K Chan, G W K Yip, L C C Kum, E B Wu, P-W Lee, Y-Y Lam, S Chan, J W-H Fung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the values of three different forms of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) processing in predicting left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling-namely, tissue velocity, displacement and strain mapping.
DESIGN: Standard echocardiography with TDI was performed before and 3 months after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 55 patients with heart failure who received CRT and were followed up for at least 3 months were recruited.
INTERVENTIONS: During off-line analysis, the time to peak systolic velocity in the ejection phase, time to peak positive displacement and time to peak negative strain were measured in the six basal, six mid-segmental model. Parameters of systolic asynchrony derived by velocity, displacement and strain mapping were correlated with percentage reduction in LV end systolic volume (LVESV) and absolute gain in ejection fraction (EF).
RESULTS: Among the three TDI processing technologies, all parameters of tissue velocity correlated with LV reverse remodelling (r = -0.49 to r = -0.76, all p < 0.001), but the predictive value was strongest in models with 12 LV segments. For displacement mapping, only the two parameters that included 12 LV segments correlated modestly with reduction in LVESV (r = -0.36, p < 0.05) and gain in EF. However, none of the strain mapping parameters predicted a favourable echocardiographic response. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas were higher for parameters of tissue velocity based on 12 LV segments (ROC areas 0.88 and 0.94) than the corresponding areas derived from displacement mapping (ROC areas 0.72 and 0.71).
CONCLUSION: Tissue velocity parameters of systolic asynchrony are superior to those of displacement and strain mapping in predicting LV reverse remodelling response after CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16621873      PMCID: PMC1861066          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.083592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  29 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac dyssynchrony for predicting a favourable response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  C M Yu; J J Bax; M Monaghan; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  The contribution of echocardiography to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Stylianos Tzeis; Athanasios Kranidis; George Andrikopoulos; Konstantinos Kappos; Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Understanding nonresponders of cardiac resynchronization therapy--current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Qing Zhang; John E Sanderson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10

4.  Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Marc Vanderheyden; Tine De Backer; Maximo Rivero-Ayerza; Peter Geelen; Jozef Bartunek; Sofie Verstreken; Mark De Zutter; Marc Goethals
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; Gabe B Bleeker; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Martin J Schalij; Qing Zhang; Ernst E van der Wall; Yat-Sun Chan; Shun-Ling Kong; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Echocardiographic examination of atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Porciani; Cristina Dondina; Roberto Macioce; Gabriele Demarchi; Paolo Pieragnoli; Nicola Musilli; Andrea Colella; Giuseppe Ricciardi; Antonio Michelucci; Luigi Padeletti
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

Authors:  P Ritter; L Padeletti; L Gillio-Meina; G Gaggini
Journal:  Europace       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Measurement of postsystolic shortening to assess viability and predict recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Hosokawa; F H Sheehan; T Suzuki
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Mechanism of hemodynamic improvement by dual-chamber pacing for severe left ventricular dysfunction: an acute Doppler and catheterization hemodynamic study.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; D L Hayes; D R Holmes; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  22 in total

1.  Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David Birnie; Rob A de Kemp; Anthony S Tang; Terence D Ruddy; Michael H Gollob; Ann Guo; Kathryn Williams; Kerry Thomson; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Acute and chronic response to CRT in narrow QRS patients.

Authors:  Tim Donahue; Imran Niazi; Angel Leon; Michael Stucky; Keith Herrmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  SPECT blood pool phase analysis can accurately and reproducibly quantify mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Richard W Wassenaar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Current and future role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Paul W X Foley
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Nuclear Image-Guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).

Authors:  Weihua Zhou; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Strain imaging in echocardiography: methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Gillian C Nesbitt; Sunil Mankad; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Imaging in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  C Ypenburg; E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; J J Bax
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  The use of nuclear imaging for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Mark J Boogers; Mark M Boogers; Jeroen J Bax; Prem Soman; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  A modified echocardiographic protocol with intrinsic plausibility control to determine intraventricular asynchrony based on TDI and TSI.

Authors:  Henryk Dreger; Adrian C Borges; Bruno Ismer; Sebastian Schattke; Berthold Stegemann; Gert Baumann; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.