Literature DB >> 11228855

Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

P Ritter1, L Padeletti, L Gillio-Meina, G Gaggini.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare two methods determining the optimal atrioventicular delay (AVD) in 19 patients implanted with the BEST-Living system for complete heart block. The definition of the optimal AVD was: the AVD with the echo method that provided the longest diastolic filling time without interruption of the A wave, and the AVD with the peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) method, corresponding to the knee of the PEA curve vs AV delay. The amplitude of the PEA was measured for every AVD programmed via an automatic scanner in steps of 60 to 300 ms (40 ms steps): in the VDD pacing mode with a low base rate, to obtain 100% sensed P waves; in DDD with a base rate = sinus rate + 20%, to obtain 100% paced P waves. Echocardiographic (Echo) measurement of the left ventricular filling time were performed in the same AV delay settings in VDD and DDD as the ones tested in the PEA method, which were manually programmed. The optimal AVDs obtained in DDD and those obtained in VDD were compared in the echo and the PEA tests by a paired Student's t-test. The optimal AVDs obtained by both Echo and by PEA were also compared by a paired Student's t-test in VDD and DDD. The r value of the correlation between the optimal AVDs obtained by Echo and those obtained by PEA was calculated. Similar values of optimal AVD were obtained with both methods. The optimal AVDs given by the Echo technique (179 +/- 25 ms in DDD and 124 +/- 18 ms in VDD) were slightly, but significantly shorter than the ones obtained with the PEA method (202 +/- 21 ms in DDD and 145 +/- 18 ms in VDD, P < 0.05). A highly significant difference between AVD VDD and AVD DDD was found with both methods (P < 0.001). The correlation between the AVDs obtained with the echo and the PEA methods was highly significant (r = 0.78, P < 0.01). Pacemaker software could be modified to determine automatically the optimal AVDs to be applied throughout the heart rate range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11228855     DOI: 10.1053/eupc.1998.0032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  36 in total

1.  Comparison of echocardiography and device based algorithm for atrio-ventricular delay optimization in heart block patients.

Authors:  Rajesh Vijayvergiya; Ankur Gupta
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

3.  Tissue Doppler velocity is superior to displacement and strain mapping in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling response after cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  C-M Yu; Q Zhang; Y-S Chan; C-K Chan; G W K Yip; L C C Kum; E B Wu; P-W Lee; Y-Y Lam; S Chan; J W-H Fung
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  [Optimized CRT programming: relevance and practical application].

Authors:  F Bode; F Schütte
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-09

Review 5.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Doppler echocardiographic methods for optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Alan D Waggoner; Lisa de las Fuentes; Victor G Davila-Roman
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.724

7.  Growth differentiation factor-15 predicts mortality and morbidity after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Paul W X Foley; Berthold Stegemann; Kelvin Ng; Sud Ramachandran; Anthony Proudler; Michael P Frenneaux; Leong L Ng; Francisco Leyva
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Development and validation of a clinical index to predict survival after cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  F Leyva; P W X Foley; B Stegemann; J A Ward; L L Ng; M P Frenneaux; F Regoli; R E A Smith; A Auricchio
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Non-invasive determination of the optimized atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted biventricular pacing devices.

Authors:  Thomas Deneke; Thomas Lawo; Stefan von Dryander; Peter Hubert Grewe; Alfried Germing; Eduard Gorr; Peter Hubben; Andreas Mugge; Dong-In Shin; Bernd Lemke
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-02-01

10.  AV Interval Optimization - A Step Towards Physiological Pacing in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Shomu Bohora
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.