Literature DB >> 16619951

Visual motion interferes with tactile motion perception.

James C Craig1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that visual apparent motion can alter the judgment of auditory apparent motion. We investigated the effect of visual apparent motion on judgments of the direction of tactile apparent motion. When visual motion was presented at the same time as, but in a direction opposite to, tactile motion, accuracy in judging the direction of tactile apparent motion was substantially reduced. This reduction in performance is referred to as 'the congruency effect'. Similar effects were observed when the visual display was placed either near to the tactile display or at some distance from the tactile display (experiment 1). In experiment 2, the relative alignment between the visual and tactile directions of motion was varied. The size of the congruency effect was similar at 0 degrees and 45 degrees alignments but much reduced at a 90 degrees alignment. In experiment 3, subjects made confidence ratings of their judgments of the direction of the tactile motion. The results indicated that the congruency effect was not due to subjects being unsure of the direction of motion and being forced to guess. In experiment 4, static visual stimuli were shown to have no effect on the judgments of direction of the tactile stimuli. The extent to which the congruency effect reflects capture effects and is the result of perceptual versus post-perceptual processes is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16619951     DOI: 10.1068/p5334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  15 in total

1.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Roland Thomaschke; Matthias J Linhardt; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J H Killebrew; J C Craig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Toshimitsu Takahashi; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Enhanced effectiveness in visuo-haptic object-selective brain regions with increasing stimulus salience.

Authors:  Sunah Kim; Thomas W James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Integration of visual and tactile information in reproduction of traveled distance.

Authors:  Jan Churan; Johannes Paul; Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Touch-contingent visual motion perception: tactile events drive visual motion perception.

Authors:  Ryo Teraoka; Wataru Teramoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Rubber hand presentation modulates visuotactile interference effect especially in persons with high autistic traits.

Authors:  Makoto Wada; Masakazu Ide
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Motion aftereffects transfer between touch and vision.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Qi Wang; Vincent Hayward; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Neural correlates of audiovisual motion capture.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.