Literature DB >> 16619102

Peer-assisted learning in the athletic training clinical setting.

Jolene M Henning1, Thomas G Weidner, James Jones.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Athletic training educators often anecdotally suggest that athletic training students enhance their learning by teaching their peers. However, peer-assisted learning (PAL) has not been examined within athletic training education in order to provide evidence for its current use or as a pedagogic tool.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of PAL in athletic training clinical education and to identify students' perceptions of PAL.
DESIGN: Descriptive.
SETTING: "The Athletic Training Student Seminar" at the National Athletic Trainers' Association 2002 Annual Meeting and Clinical Symposia. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 138 entry-level male and female athletic training students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Students' perceptions regarding the prevalence and benefits of and preferences for PAL were measured using the Athletic Training Peer-Assisted Learning Assessment Survey. The Survey is a self-report tool with 4 items regarding the prevalence of PAL and 7 items regarding perceived benefits and preferences.
RESULTS: A total of 66% of participants practiced a moderate to large amount of their clinical skills with other athletic training students. Sixty percent of students reported feeling less anxious when performing clinical skills on patients in front of other athletic training students than in front of their clinical instructors. Chi-square analysis revealed that 91% of students enrolled in Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs-accredited athletic training education programs learned a minimal to small amount of clinical skills from their peers compared with 65% of students in Joint Review Committee on Educational Programs in Athletic Training-candidacy schools (chi2(3) = 14.57, P < .01). Multiple analysis of variance revealed significant interactions between sex and academic level on several items regarding benefits and preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: According to athletic training students, PAL is occurring in the athletic training clinical setting. Entry-level students are utilizing their peers as resources for practicing clinical skills and report benefiting from the collaboration. Educators should consider deliberately integrating PAL into athletic training education programs to enhance student learning and collaboration.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 16619102      PMCID: PMC1421493     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  33 in total

1.  Supervising and supporting student nurses in clinical placements: the peer support initiative.

Authors:  Liz Aston; Alexander Molassiotis
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited.

Authors:  Ashar Wadoodi; Joy R Crosby
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Evaluation of the mentor-mentee relationship in an occupational therapy mentorship programme.

Authors:  Tracy Milner; Ann Bossers
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.448

4.  Peer-to-peer mentoring: teaching collegiality.

Authors:  Elaine S Scott
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.082

5.  Peer mentorship in clinical education: outcomes of a pilot programme for first year students.

Authors:  P Yates; J Cunningham; W Moyle; J Wollin
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Enhancing clinical competence using a collaborative clinical education model.

Authors:  J DeClute; R Ladyshewsky
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1993-10

7.  A model for peer tutoring in the medical school setting.

Authors:  L A Walker-Bartnick; J H Berger; M M Kappelman
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-04

8.  Experiential learning of clinical skills by beginning nursing students: "coaching" project by fourth-year student interns.

Authors:  M Aviram; R Ophir; D Raviv; M Shiloah
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.726

9.  Peer review: a successful teaching strategy in baccalaureate education.

Authors:  J P Flynn; M T Marcus; J C Schmadl
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.726

Review 10.  An experience of peer mentoring with student nurses: enhancement of personal and professional growth.

Authors:  N Glass; R Walter
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.726

View more
  10 in total

1.  One or two trainees per workplace for laparoscopic surgery training courses: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Andreas Minassian; Jonathan David Hendrie; Laura Benner; Anas Amin Preukschas; Hannes Götz Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Perceived frequency of peer-assisted learning in the laboratory and collegiate clinical settings.

Authors:  Jolene M Henning; Thomas G Weidner; Melissa Snyder; William N Dudley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Accuracy and reliability of peer assessment of athletic training psychomotor laboratory skills.

Authors:  Melissa C Marty; Jolene M Henning; John T Willse
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Clinical integration and how it affects student retention in undergraduate athletic training programs.

Authors:  Allison Young; Joanne Klossner; Carrie L Docherty; Thomas M Dodge; James M Mensch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Peer-assisted learning and orthopaedic evaluation psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Thomas G Weidner; Jennifer K Popp
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Role strain in collegiate athletic training approved clinical instructors.

Authors:  Jolene M Henning; Thomas G Weidner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The professional socialization of the athletic trainer serving as a preceptor.

Authors:  Stephanie M Mazerolle; Thomas G Bowman; Thomas M Dodge
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  One or two trainees per workplace in a structured multimodality training curriculum for laparoscopic surgery? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DRKS00004675.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Felix Jede; Andreas Minassian; Matthias Gondan; Jonathan D Hendrie; Tobias Gehrig; Georg R Linke; Martina Kadmon; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Implementing a peer-learning approach for the clinical education of respiratory therapy students.

Authors:  Stephanie Dorner; Tara Fowler; Martha Montano; Ray Janisse; Mandy Lowe; Paula Rowland
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2019-02-15

10.  Peer-to-Peer Collaboration Adds Value for Surgical Colleagues.

Authors:  Ameer M Elbuluk; Michael P Ast; Jeffrey D Stimac; Trevor R Banka; Matthew P Abdel; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-05-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.