| Literature DB >> 16618737 |
Yaron Hassid1, Edna Furman-Haran, Raanan Margalit, Raya Eilam, Hadassa Degani.
Abstract
Tumor response to blood borne drugs is critically dependent on the efficiency of vascular delivery and transcapillary transfer. However, increased tumor interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) forms a barrier to transcapillary transfer, leading to resistance to drug delivery. We present here a new, noninvasive method which estimates IFP and its spatial distribution in vivo using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This method was tested in ectopic human non-small-cell lung cancer which exhibited a high IFP of approximately 28 mm Hg and, for comparison, in orthotopic MCF7 human breast tumors which exhibited a lower IFP of approximately 14 mm Hg, both implanted in nude mice. The MRI protocol consisted of slow infusion of the contrast agent [gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (GdDTPA)] into the blood for approximately 2 hours, sequential acquisition of images before and during the infusion, and measurements of T1 relaxation rates before infusion and after blood and tumor GdDTPA concentration reached a steady state. Image analysis yielded parametric images of steady-state tissue GdDTPA concentration with high values of this concentration outside the tumor boundaries, approximately 1 mmol/L, declining in the tumor periphery to approximately 0.5 mmol/L, and then steeply decreasing to low or null values. The distribution of steady-state tissue GdDTPA concentration reflected the distribution of IFP, showing an increase from the rim inward, with a high IFP plateau inside the tumor. The changes outside the borders of the tumors with high IFP were indicative of convective transport through the interstitium. This work presents a noninvasive method for assessing the spatial distribution of tumor IFP and mapping barriers to drug delivery and transport.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16618737 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res ISSN: 0008-5472 Impact factor: 12.701