Literature DB >> 22938371

Evaluation of a voxelized model based on DCE-MRI for tracer transport in tumor.

K N Magdoom1, Gregory L Pishko, Jung Hwan Kim, Malisa Sarntinoranont.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the treatment of cancer involving therapeutic agents have shown promising results. However, treatment efficacy can be limited due to inadequate and uneven uptake in solid tumors, thereby making the prediction of drug transport important for developing effective therapeutic strategies. In this study, a patient-specific computational porous media model (voxelized model) was developed for predicting the interstitial flow field and distribution of a systemically delivered magnetic resonance (MR) visible tracer in a tumor. The benefits of a voxel approach include less labor and less computational time (approximately an order of magnitude reduction compared to the traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach developed earlier by our group). The model results were compared with that obtained from a previous approach based on unstructured meshes along with MR-measured tracer concentration data within tumors, using statistical analysis and qualitative representations. The statistical analysis indicated the similarity between the structured and unstructured models' results with a low root mean square error (RMS) and a high correlation coefficient. The voxelized model captured features of the flow field and tracer distribution such as high interstitial fluid pressure inside the tumor and the heterogeneous distribution of the tracer. Predictions of tracer distribution by the voxelized approach also resulted in low RMS error when compared with MR-measured data over a 1 h time course. The similarity in the voxelized model results with experiment and the nonvoxelized model predictions were maintained across three different tumors. Overall, the voxelized model serves as a reliable and swift alternative to approaches using unstructured meshes in predicting extracellular transport within tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938371      PMCID: PMC5413137          DOI: 10.1115/1.4007096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  37 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of macromolecular concentration during direct infusion into an agarose hydrogel phantom using contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoming Chen; Garrett W Astary; Hector Sepulveda; Thomas H Mareci; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Role of tumor vascular architecture in nutrient and drug delivery: an invasion percolation-based network model.

Authors:  J W Baish; Y Gazit; D A Berk; M Nozue; L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.514

4.  Computer simulation of the delivery of etanidazole to brain tumor from PLGA wafers: comparison between linear and double burst release systems.

Authors:  Wilson Hor Keong Tan; Fangjing Wang; Timothy Lee; Chi-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2003-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Y Boucher; L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Numerical simulation of blood and interstitial flow through a solid tumor.

Authors:  C Pozrikidis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Voxelized model of interstitial transport in the rat spinal cord following direct infusion into white matter.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Kim; Garrett W Astary; Xiaoming Chen; Thomas H Mareci; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Characterization of neuroblastoma xenograft in rat flank. I. Growth, interstitial fluid pressure, and interstitial fluid velocity distribution profiles.

Authors:  G R DiResta; J Lee; S M Larson; E Arbit
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.514

9.  Effect of increasing vascular hydraulic conductivity on delivery of macromolecular drugs to tumor cells.

Authors:  A W el-Kareh; T W Secomb
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-07-30       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Interstitial hypertension in superficial metastatic melanomas in humans.

Authors:  Y Boucher; J M Kirkwood; D Opacic; M Desantis; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  7 in total

1.  Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Antiangiogenic Drugs and Liposomal Cytotoxic Drugs to Heterogeneous Brain Tumor for Combination Therapy.

Authors:  Ajay Bhandari; Kartikey Jaiswal; Anup Singh; Wenbo Zhan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  MRI-based computational model of heterogeneous tracer transport following local infusion into a mouse hind limb tumor.

Authors:  Kulam Najmudeen Magdoom; Gregory L Pishko; Lori Rice; Chris Pampo; Dietmar W Siemann; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Improving the Predictions of Computational Models of Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery by Accounting for Diffusion Non-gaussianity.

Authors:  Eirini Messaritaki; Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna; Greg D Parker; William P Gray; Derek K Jones
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  A computational model of glioma reveals opposing, stiffness-sensitive effects of leaky vasculature and tumor growth on tissue mechanical stress and porosity.

Authors:  Julian A Rey; James R Ewing; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-08-07

5.  Spatiotemporal quantification of local drug delivery using MRI.

Authors:  Morgan B Giers; Alex C McLaren; Jonathan D Plasencia; David Frakes; Ryan McLemore; Michael R Caplan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Computational Modeling of Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Velocity in Head and Neck Cancer Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Feasibility Analysis.

Authors:  Eve LoCastro; Ramesh Paudyal; Yousef Mazaheri; Vaios Hatzoglou; Jung Hun Oh; Yonggang Lu; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Kira Vom Eigen; Alan Ho; James R Ewing; Nancy Lee; Joseph O Deasy; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

7.  Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) of the kidney with an approximate microvascular network.

Authors:  Liangdong Zhou; Qihao Zhang; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D Nguyen; John Morgan; Weiying Dai; Yi Li; Ajay Gupta; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.668

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.