Literature DB >> 21751070

Sensitivity analysis of an image-based solid tumor computational model with heterogeneous vasculature and porosity.

Gregory L Pishko1, Garrett W Astary, Thomas H Mareci, Malisa Sarntinoranont.   

Abstract

An MR image-based computational model of a murine KHT sarcoma is presented that allows the calculation of plasma fluid and solute transport within tissue. Such image-based models of solid tumors may be used to optimize patient-specific therapies. This model incorporates heterogeneous vasculature and tissue porosity to account for nonuniform perfusion of an MR-visible tracer, gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was conducted following intravenous infusion of Gd-DTPA to provide 1 h of tracer-concentration distribution data within tissue. Early time points (19 min) were used to construct 3D K(trans) and porosity maps using a two-compartment model; tracer transport was predicted at later time points using a 3D porous media model. Model development involved selecting an arterial input function (AIF) and conducting a sensitivity analysis of model parameters (tissue, vascular, and initial estimation of solute concentration in plasma) to investigate the effects on transport for a specific tumor. The developed model was then used to predict transport in two additional tumors. The sensitivity analysis suggests that plasma fluid transport is more sensitive to parameter changes than solute transport due to the dominance of transvascular exchange. Gd-DTPA distribution was similar to experimental patterns, but differences in Gd-DTPA magnitude at later time points may result from inaccurate selection of AIF. Thus, accurate AIF estimation is important for later time point prediction of low molecular weight tracer or drug transport in smaller tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21751070      PMCID: PMC3373181          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0349-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  49 in total

1.  A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes.

Authors:  K H Diehl; R Hull; D Morton; R Pfister; Y Rabemampianina; D Smith; J M Vidal; C van de Vorstenbosch
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Interstitial transport and transvascular fluid exchange during infusion into brain and tumor tissue.

Authors:  Joshua H Smith; Joseph A C Humphrey
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 3.514

3.  A model of fluid flow in solid tumors.

Authors:  C Pozrikidis; D A Farrow
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Diffusion of paramagnetically labeled proteins in cartilage: enhancement of the 1-D NMR imaging technique.

Authors:  B D Foy; J Blake
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements.

Authors:  M Milosevic; A Fyles; D Hedley; M Pintilie; W Levin; L Manchul; R Hill
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors.

Authors:  P A Netti; D A Berk; M A Swartz; A J Grodzinsky; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Identifying tumor vascular permeability heterogeneity with magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Authors:  Michael Aref; Martin Brechbiel; Erik C Wiener
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated.

Authors:  M Stohrer; Y Boucher; M Stangassinger; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Apparent diffusion coefficient: a quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization.

Authors:  Andreas M Herneth; Samira Guccione; Mark Bednarski
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Computer simulation of the delivery of etanidazole to brain tumor from PLGA wafers: comparison between linear and double burst release systems.

Authors:  Wilson Hor Keong Tan; Fangjing Wang; Timothy Lee; Chi-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2003-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Functional magnetic nanoparticles for non-viral gene delivery and MR imaging.

Authors:  Ruijun Xing; Gang Liu; Jinghan Zhu; Yanglong Hou; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Theoretical evaluation of enhanced gold nanoparticle delivery to PC3 tumors due to increased hydraulic conductivity or recovered lymphatic function after mild whole body hyperthermia.

Authors:  Manpreet Singh; Ronghui Ma; Liang Zhu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Toward a noninvasive estimate of interstitial fluid pressure by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in a rat model of cerebral tumor.

Authors:  Rasha Elmghirbi; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Stephen L Brown; Kelly A Keenan; Swayamprava Panda; Glauber Cabral; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; George W Divine; Ian Y Lee; James R Ewing
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Peritumoral tissue compression is predictive of exudate flux in a rat model of cerebral tumor: an MRI study in an embedded tumor.

Authors:  James R Ewing; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Madhava P Aryal; Kelly A Keenan; Rasha Elmghirbi; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Swayamprava Panda; Mei Lu; Tom Mikkelsen; Glauber Cabral; Stephen L Brown
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Evaluation of a voxelized model based on DCE-MRI for tracer transport in tumor.

Authors:  K N Magdoom; Gregory L Pishko; Jung Hwan Kim; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Predictive Design and Analysis of Drug Transport by Multiscale Computational Models Under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Ali Aykut Akalın; Barış Dedekargınoğlu; Sae Rome Choi; Bumsoo Han; Altug Ozcelikkale
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.580

7.  Multiphysics Modeling and Simulation of Subcutaneous Injection and Absorption of Biotherapeutics: Sensitivity Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Hou; Fudan Zheng; Clairissa D Corpstein; Lei Xing; Tonglei Li
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Development of manganese-based nanoparticles as contrast probes for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zipeng Zhen; Jin Xie
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  A coupled discrete/continuum model for describing cancer-therapeutic transport in the lung.

Authors:  Karin Erbertseder; Johannes Reichold; Bernd Flemisch; Patrick Jenny; Rainer Helmig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A computational model of glioma reveals opposing, stiffness-sensitive effects of leaky vasculature and tumor growth on tissue mechanical stress and porosity.

Authors:  Julian A Rey; James R Ewing; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.