Literature DB >> 16618500

Development of a soft tissue seal around bone-anchored transcutaneous amputation prostheses.

Catherine J Pendegrass1, Allen E Goodship, Gordon W Blunn.   

Abstract

Conventional amputation prosthetics are problematic because they rely on the stump-socket interface for attachment. Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prostheses (ITAP) could solve these problems; however they rely on the integrity of the soft tissue-implant interface as a barrier to exogenous agents, and in the prevention of downgrowth and marsupilisation. We have used an in vivo animal model to study the soft tissue interfaces around bone-anchored transcutaneous implants. We hypothesise that by facilitating and increasing the area of dermal attachment to the implant epithelial down-growth will be reduced. A flange with a series of 24, 0.7 mm holes positioned immediately below the epithelium was used to increase dermal attachment. This significantly reduced downgrowth and optimised the integrity of the collagenous tissue-implant interface at the dermal level. We postulate that the flange reduces relative interfacial movement at the epithelium-implant interface by providing increased surface area for dermal tissue attachment. A tight seal at the dermal tissue level reduces the degree of downgrowth around ITAP, eliminating marsupilisation as a potential failure modality. Surface topography and coatings did not affect the degree of downgrowth or dermal attachment to straight or flanged implants. A significant negative correlation was observed between downgrowth and both epithelial and dermal attachment. This study shows that a soft tissue-implant interface capable of preventing downgrowth and marsupilisation can develop around a bone-anchored transcutaneous implant, given the incorporation of a porous flange positioned in the dermal tissues immediately below the epithelium. This will benefit applications where bone-anchored transcutaneous implants are used.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16618500     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  37 in total

1.  Characterization of bacterial isolates collected from a sheep model of osseointegration.

Authors:  Dustin L Williams; Roy D Bloebaum; James P Beck; Cathy A Petti
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Negative pressure wound therapy limits downgrowth in percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Saranne J Mitchell; Sujee Jeyapalina; Francesca R Nichols; Jayant Agarwal; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Designing polyHEMA substrates that mimic the viscoelastic response of soft tissue.

Authors:  Brian Holt; Anubhav Tripathi; Jeffrey R Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Porous composite prosthetic pylon for integration with skin and bone.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin; Grigory Raykhtsaum; John Pilling; Oleg V Galibin; Mikhail V Protasov; Julie V Chihovskaya; Irina G Belyaeva; Miralda I Blinova; Natalia M Yudintseva; Igor L Potokin; George P Pinaev; Vladimir Moxson; Volodimir Duz
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2007

5.  One lesson from arthroplasty to osseointegration in search for better fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

6.  An animal model to evaluate skin-implant-bone integration and gait with a prosthesis directly attached to the residual limb.

Authors:  Brad J Farrell; Boris I Prilutsky; Robert S Kistenberg; John F Dalton; Mark Pitkin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Biomimetic coatings and negative pressure wound therapy independently limit epithelial downgrowth around percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Sujee Jeyapalina; Saranne J Mitchell; Jayant Agarwal; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  [Endo-exo prostheses following limb-amputation].

Authors:  D-L Juhnke; H-H Aschoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Magnetoelastic vibrational biomaterials for real-time monitoring and modulation of the host response.

Authors:  E Vlaisavljevich; H R Holmes; E L Tan; Z Qian; S Trierweiler; K G Ong; R M Rajachar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Cell Cultivation on Porous Titanium Implants with Various Structures.

Authors:  M I Blinova; N M Yudintzeva; N S Nikolaenko; I L Potokin; G Raykhtsaum; M R Pitkin; G P Pinaev
Journal:  Cell tissue biol       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.