Literature DB >> 16615381

When the visual format of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the stroop effect.

Chris Blais1, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

We investigated the impact of making the color carrier word visually unfamiliar via case and font mixInG in the context of three Stroop experiments. Experiment 1 yielded an increase in the size of the Stroop effect when the color carrier words were visually unfamiliar relative to lowercase words that were case and font consistent. Experiments 2A and 2B showed that the modulation of the Stroop effect by visual familiarity observed in Experiment 1 was eliminated when there was no correlation between the color and the color carrier word. These results are considered in the light of four different theoretical accounts of the Stroop effect (strength of association [Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 19901, instance [Logan, 1988], schema [MacLeod, 2000], and obligatory processing followed by deactivation [Coltheart, Woollams, Kinoshita, & Perry, 1999]). None of these accounts appear capable of explaining all the results.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615381     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  A position-sensitive Stroop effect: further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion.

Authors:  M Coltheart; A Woollams; S Kinoshita; C Perry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity.

Authors:  C M MacLeod; K Dunbar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Basic processes in reading: computation of abstract letter identities.

Authors:  D Besner; M Coltheart; E Davelaar
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1984-03

9.  The Stroop effect: it is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be.

Authors:  M Dishon-Berkovits; D Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.