Literature DB >> 16611847

Position information but not force information is used in adapting to changes in environmental dynamics.

Theodore E Milner1, Mark R Hinder.   

Abstract

This study investigated how movement error is evaluated and used to change feedforward commands following a change in the environmental dynamics. In particular, we addressed the question of whether only position-error information is used or whether information about the force-field direction can also be used for rapid adaptation to changes in the environmental dynamics. Subjects learned to move in a position-dependent force field (PF) with a parabolic profile and the dynamics of a negative spring, which produced lateral force to the left of the target hand path. They adapted very rapidly, dramatically reducing lateral error after a single trial. Several times during training, the strength of the PF was unexpectedly doubled (PF2) for two trials. This again created a large leftward deviation, which was greatly reduced on the second PF2 trial, and an aftereffect when the force field subsequently returned to its original strength. The aftereffect was abolished if the second PF2 trial was replaced by an oppositely directed velocity-dependent force field (VF). During subsequent training in the VF, immediately after having adapted to the PF, subjects applied a force that assisted the force field for approximately 15 trials, indicating that they did not use information about the force-field direction. We concluded that the CNS uses only the position error for updating the internal model of the environmental dynamics and modifying feedforward commands. Although this strategy is not necessarily optimal, it may be the most reliable strategy for iterative improvement in performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611847     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00022.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  7 in total

1.  Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment.

Authors:  Christopher N Schabowsky; Joseph M Hidler; Peter S Lum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Specific interpretation of augmented feedback changes motor performance and cortical processing.

Authors:  Benedikt Lauber; Martin Keller; Christian Leukel; Albert Gollhofer; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback.

Authors:  Benedikt Lauber; Martin Keller; Christian Leukel; Albert Gollhofer; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Relative temporal leading or following position of the contralateral limb generates different aftereffects in muscle phasing following adaptation training post-stroke.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; David A Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment.

Authors:  Christopher N Schabowsky; Alexander W Dromerick; Rahsaan J Holley; Brian Monroe; Peter S Lum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Time to task failure and motor cortical activity depend on the type of feedback in visuomotor tasks.

Authors:  Benedikt Lauber; Christian Leukel; Albert Gollhofer; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Increasing muscle co-contraction speeds up internal model acquisition during dynamic motor learning.

Authors:  James B Heald; David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.