Literature DB >> 27404742

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback.

Benedikt Lauber1, Martin Keller2, Christian Leukel3, Albert Gollhofer4, Wolfgang Taube2.   

Abstract

During motor behaviour, humans interact with the environment by for example manipulating objects and this is only possible because sensory feedback is constantly integrated into the central nervous system and these sensory inputs need to be weighted in order meet the task specific goals. Additional feedback presented as augmented feedback was shown to have an impact on motor control and motor learning. A number of studies investigated whether force or position feedback has an influence on motor control and neural activation. However, as in the previous studies the presentation of the force and position feedback was always identical, a recent study assessed whether not only the content but also the interpretation of the feedback has an influence on the time to fatigue of a sustained submaximal contraction and the (inhibitory) activity of the primary motor cortex using subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation. This paper describes one possible way to investigate the influence of the interpretation of feedback on motor behaviour by investigating the time to fatigue of submaximal sustained contractions together with the neuromuscular adaptations that can be investigated using surface EMG. Furthermore, the current protocol also describes how motor cortical (inhibitory) activity can be investigated using subthreshold TMS, a method known to act solely on the cortical level. The results show that when participants interpret the feedback as position feedback, they display a significantly shorter time to fatigue of a submaximal sustained contraction. Furthermore, subjects also displayed an increased inhibitory activity of the primary cortex when they believed to receive position feedback compared when they believed to receive force feedback. Accordingly, the results show that interpretation of feedback results in differences on a behavioural level (time to fatigue) that is also reflected in interpretation-specific differences in the amount of inhibitory M1 activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27404742      PMCID: PMC4993220          DOI: 10.3791/53291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  43 in total

1.  Differential changes in corticospinal and Ia input to tibialis anterior and soleus motor neurones during voluntary contraction in man.

Authors:  H Morita; E Olivier; J Baumgarten; N T Petersen; L O Christensen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2000-09

2.  Motor cortex excitability does not increase during sustained cycling exercise to volitional exhaustion.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-06-07

Review 3.  Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review.

Authors:  Birgit I Molier; Edwin H F Van Asseldonk; Hermie J Hermens; Michiel J A Jannink
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Sustained cycling exercise increases intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Benedikt Lauber; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Jump performance and augmented feedback: immediate benefits and long-term training effects.

Authors:  Martin Keller; Benedikt Lauber; Dominic Gehring; Christian Leukel; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Muscle activation and time to task failure differ with load type and contraction intensity for a human hand muscle.

Authors:  Katrina S Maluf; Minoru Shinohara; Jennifer L Stephenson; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long-latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P D Cheney; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Facilitatory effect of tonic voluntary contraction on responses to motor cortex stimulation.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; K Sakai; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-12

10.  Cross-limb interference during motor learning.

Authors:  Benedikt Lauber; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Martin Keller; Albert Gollhofer; Wolfgang Taube; Christian Leukel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The type of visual biofeedback influences maximal handgrip strength and activation strategies.

Authors:  Philémon Marcel-Millet; Philippe Gimenez; Alain Groslambert; Gilles Ravier; Sidney Grospretre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.