Literature DB >> 18443766

Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment.

Christopher N Schabowsky1, Alexander W Dromerick, Rahsaan J Holley, Brian Monroe, Peter S Lum.   

Abstract

This study investigated differences in adaptation to a novel dynamic environment between eight trans-radial upper extremity (UE) prosthetic users and eight naive, neurologically intact subjects. Participants held onto the handle of a robotic manipulandum and executed reaching movements within a horizontal plane following a pseudo-random sequence of targets. Curl field perturbations were imposed by the robot motors, and we compared the rate and quality of adaptation between the prosthetic and control subjects. Adaptation was quantitatively assessed by peak error, defined as the maximum orthogonal distance between an observed trajectory and an ideal straight trajectory. Initial exposure to the curl field resulted in large errors, and as the subjects adapted to the novel environment, the errors decreased. During the early phase of adaptation, group differences in the rate of motor adaptation were not significant. However, during late learning, both error magnitude and variability were larger in the prosthetic group. The quality of adaptation, as indicated by the magnitude of the aftereffects, was similar between groups. We conclude that in persons with trans-radial arm amputation, motor adaptation to curl fields during reaching is similar to unimpaired individuals. These findings are discussed in relation to mechanisms of motor adaptation, neural plasticity following an upper extremity amputation (UEA), and potential motor recovery therapies for prosthetic users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443766     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1394-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  62 in total

1.  Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity.

Authors:  Kimatha Oxford Grice; Kimberly A Vogel; Viet Le; Ana Mitchell; Sonia Muniz; Mary Ann Vollmer
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

2.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration.

Authors:  Alberto Esquenazi
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004 Jul 22-Aug 5       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Changes in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck-shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movement.

Authors:  Pascal Madeleine; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.

Authors:  T W Wright; A D Hagen; M B Wood
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; M F Levin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity?

Authors:  Herta Flor; Lone Nikolajsen; Troels Staehelin Jensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.

Authors:  I Dudkiewicz; R Gabrielov; I Seiv-Ner; G Zelig; M Heim
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 3.033

View more
  8 in total

1.  Internal models of upper limb prosthesis users when grasping and lifting a fragile object with their prosthetic limb.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Iian Black; Rahsaan J Holley; Jessica Barth; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural activation differences in amputees during imitation of intact versus amputee movements.

Authors:  William F Cusack; Michael Cope; Sheryl Nathanson; Nikta Pirouz; Robert Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Virtual Training of the Myosignal.

Authors:  Bernhard Terlaak; Hanneke Bouwsema; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Hanneke Bouwsema; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Development and performance of a new prosthesis system using ultrasonic sensor for wrist movements: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Hossein Gholizadeh; Sadeeq Ali
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Quantitative Eye Gaze and Movement Differences in Visuomotor Adaptations to Varying Task Demands Among Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Hebert; Quinn A Boser; Aïda M Valevicius; Hiroki Tanikawa; Ewen B Lavoie; Albert H Vette; Patrick M Pilarski; Craig S Chapman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

7.  Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Rebecca L Stine; Craig W Heckathorne; Stefania Fatone; Steven A Gard
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Virtual Integration Environment as an Advanced Prosthetic Limb Training Platform.

Authors:  Briana N Perry; Robert S Armiger; Kristin E Yu; Ali A Alattar; Courtney W Moran; Mikias Wolde; Kayla McFarland; Paul F Pasquina; Jack W Tsao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.