Literature DB >> 16604348

The effect of beta-bungarotoxin, or geniculate ganglion lesion on taste bud development in the chick embryo.

Donald Ganchrow1, Judith Ganchrow, Martin Witt, Eve Arki-Burstyn.   

Abstract

Chick taste bud (gemmal) primordia normally appear on embryonic day (E) 16 and incipient immature, spherical-shaped buds at E17. In ovo injection of beta-bungarotoxin at E12 resulted in a complete absence of taste buds in lower beak and palatal epithelium at developmental ages E17 and E21. However, putative gemmal primordia (solitary clear cells; small, cell groupings) remained, lying adjacent to salivary gland duct openings as seen in normal chick gemmal development. Oral epithelium was immunonegative to neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) suggesting gemmal primordia are nerve-independent. Some NCAM immunoreactivity was evident in autonomic ganglion-like cells and nerve fibers in connective tissue. After unilateral geniculate ganglion/otocyst excision on E2.5, at developmental ages E18 and posthatching day 1, approximately 12% of surviving ipsilateral geniculate ganglion cells sustained approximately 54% of the unoperated gemmal counts. After E18, proportional stages of differentiation in surviving developing buds probably reflect their degree of innervation, as well as rate of differentiation. Irrespective of the degree of geniculate ganglion damage, the proportion of surviving buds can be sustained at the same differentiated bud stage as on the unoperated side, or may differentiate to a later bud stage, consistent with the thesis that bud maturation, maintenance, and survival are nerve-dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16604348     DOI: 10.1007/s00418-006-0177-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 0948-6143            Impact factor:   4.304


  86 in total

Review 1.  Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the development of salivary glands.

Authors:  L S Cutler; W Gremski
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Amphibians provide new insights into taste-bud development.

Authors:  R G Northcutt; L A Barlow
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Neurogenesis in the nucleus vestibularis tangentialis of the chick embryo in the absence of the primary afferent fibers.

Authors:  K D Peusner; D K Morest
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Expression of BDNF and TrkB in mouse taste buds after denervation and in circumvallate papillae during development.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Uchida; Masaaki Kanazawa; Yuko Suzuki; Masako Takeda
Journal:  Arch Histol Cytol       Date:  2003-03

6.  Destruction of the preganglionic nerves by beta-bungarotoxin does not interfere with normal embryonic development of the rat adrenal medulla.

Authors:  U Tümmers; T H Müller; R Schmidt; K Seidl; K Lichtwald; P Vescei; H J Wagner; K Unsicker
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Embryonic taste buds develop in the absence of innervation.

Authors:  L A Barlow; C B Chien; R G Northcutt
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Peripheral interactions among single papilla inputs to gustatory nerve fibers.

Authors:  I J Miller
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Treatment with beta bungarotoxin blocks muscle spindle formation in fetal rats.

Authors:  J Kucera; J M Waldro
Journal:  Development       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Disappearance of afferent and efferent nerve terminals in the inner ear of the chick embryo after chronic treatment with beta-bungarotoxin.

Authors:  N Hirokawa
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The histochemistry and cell biology vade mecum: a review of 2005-2006.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Christian Zuber; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 2.  Recent progress in histochemistry.

Authors:  Christian Zuber; Douglas J Taatjes; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.304

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.