Literature DB >> 16604311

Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions.

Erin K Cressman1, Anthony N Carlsen, Romeo Chua, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that a startle 'go' stimulus, presented at a constant latency with respect to a warning stimulus, is capable of eliciting an intended voluntary movement in a simple reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (Carlsen et al. in Exp Brain Res 152:510-518, 2003; J Motor Behav 36:253-264, 2004a; Exp Brain Res 159:301-309 2004b; Valls-Solé et al. in J Physiol 516:931-938, 1999). The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of temporal uncertainty on response latency during an RT task that comprised a startle stimulus. Participants were required to perform an active 20 degrees wrist extension movement in response to an auditory tone that was presented 2,500 to 5,500 ms after a warning stimulus, in 1,000 ms increments. On certain trials the control auditory stimulus (80 dB) was unexpectedly replaced by the startle stimulus (124 dB). When participants were startled the intended voluntary movement was initiated at approximately 70 ms, regardless of foreperiod duration. The magnitude and invariance of response latencies to the startle stimulus suggest that the intended movement had indeed been prepared prior to the arrival of the imperative go stimulus, within 2.5 s of the warning stimulus. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the prepared movement decayed over a period of at least 3 s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16604311     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0459-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Cochlear and trigeminal systems contributing to the startle reflex in rats.

Authors:  B W Scott; P W Frankland; L Li; J S Yeomans
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Hiltraut Müller-Gethmann; Rolf Ulrich; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Time uncertainty in simple reaction time.

Authors:  E T KLEMMER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-03

4.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The acoustic startle reflex: neurons and connections.

Authors:  J S Yeomans; P W Frankland
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1995-11

6.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force.

Authors:  P Jaskowski; R Verleger
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1993-08

8.  Motor preparation: changes in amplitude of Achilles tendon reflexes during a fixed foreperiod of one second.

Authors:  C H Brunia
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.

Authors:  S Mattes; R Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-10

10.  Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

1.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural processes mediating the preparation and release of focal motor output are suppressed or absent during imagined movement.

Authors:  Jeremy S Eagles; Anthony N Carlsen; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor preparation is modulated by the resolution of the response timing information.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Colum D Mackinnon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Response preparation changes following practice of an asymmetrical bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Ryu Ishimoto; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Startle evoked movement is delayed in older adults: implications for brainstem processing in the elderly.

Authors:  Ursina A Tresch; Eric J Perreault; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-06-06

7.  Timing of Gun Fire Influences Sprinters' Multiple Joint Reaction Times of Whole Body in Block Start.

Authors:  Mitsuo Otsuka; Toshiyuki Kurihara; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-18

8.  Planning of ballistic movement following stroke: insights from the startle reflex.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evidence for startle as a measurable behavioral indicator of motor learning.

Authors:  Nathan J Kirkpatrick; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Eric J Perreault; Sydney Y Schaefer; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.