Literature DB >> 12904937

Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task.

Anthony N Carlsen1, Romeo Chua, J Timothy Inglis, David J Sanderson, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

Recent experiments pairing a startling stimulus with a simple reaction time (RT) task have shown that when participants are startled, a prepared movement may be triggered earlier in comparison to voluntary initiation (Carlsen et al. 2003, in press; Siegmund et al. 2001; Valls-Solé et al. 1999). The use of this paradigm in experiments may provide new insights into processes that control rapid voluntary actions. However, because the startle response habituates with repeated exposure to the startling stimulus, its use in experiments may be limited. Previously Brown et al. (1991) and later Siegmund et al. (2001) noted that individuals habituate to a startling stimulus at different rates depending on the required activity level of the participant in the task. The present experiment was designed to determine the rate at which participants habituate to a startle during the completion of a RT task. Participants completed 100 trials in which an active wrist extension to a target was performed as fast as possible following an auditory tone. An unexpected 124 dB auditory startle stimulus accompanied the imperative stimulus in 20 of these trials. For the duration of the experiment, startle response electromyographic (EMG) activity continued to be produced in the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) indicating that habituation was not complete after 20 startle trials. Furthermore RT in the startle condition was significantly shorter than control RT. However, findings indicate that when a measurable EMG burst in the SCM was present, RT was significantly shorter than when no SCM burst was present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904937     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1575-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Time-varying changes in corticospinal excitability accompanying the triphasic EMG pattern in humans.

Authors:  C D MacKinnon; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Presidential Address, 1974. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation.

Authors:  F K Graham
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Short-term and long-term habituation of the acoustic startle response in chronic decerebrate rats.

Authors:  R N Leaton; J V Cassella; G S Borszcz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Brain stem circuits mediating prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex.

Authors:  M Fendt; L Li; J S Yeomans
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The effects of caffeine and directed attention on acoustic startle habituation.

Authors:  E J Schicatano; T D Blumenthal
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Inhibition of the human startle response is affected by both prepulse intensity and eliciting stimulus intensity.

Authors:  T D Blumenthal
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Altered triggering of a prepared movement by a startling stimulus.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Michael A Hunt; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Repeated testing of prepulse inhibition and habituation of the startle reflex: a study in healthy human controls.

Authors:  K Abel; M Waikar; B Pedro; D Hemsley; M Geyer
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.153

10.  Involvement of the human cerebellum during habituation of the acoustic startle response: a PET study.

Authors:  D Timmann; C Musso; F P Kolb; M Rijntjes; M Jüptner; S P Müller; H C Diener; C Weiller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  27 in total

1.  Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Quincy J Almeida; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  TMS perturbs saccade trajectories and unmasks an internal feedback controller for saccades.

Authors:  Minnan Xu-Wilson; Jing Tian; Reza Shadmehr; David S Zee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Chris J Dakin; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Degraded expression of learned feedforward control in movements released by startle.

Authors:  Zachary A Wright; Anthony N Carlsen; Colum D MacKinnon; James L Patton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Mechanical perturbations applied during impending movement evoke startle-like responses.

Authors:  Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Jonathan B Shemmell; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

10.  Influence of non-spatial working memory demands on reach-grasp responses to loss of balance: Effects of age and fall risk.

Authors:  Kelly P Westlake; Brian P Johnson; Robert A Creath; Rachel M Neff; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.