Literature DB >> 17216211

Phenotypically plastic responses of green frog embryos to conflicting predation risk.

D H Ireland1, A J Wirsing, D L Murray.   

Abstract

Predators have been shown to alter the timing of switch points between life history stages, but few studies have addressed switch point plasticity in prey exposed simultaneously to conflicting predation pressure. We tested hatching responses of green frog (Rana clamitans) embryos subject to perceived predation risk from chemical cues released by two stage-specific predators, predicting that these predators would elicit: (1) directional hatching responses when presented independently, and (2) intermediate phenotypic responses when presented simultaneously. R. clamitans embryos in outdoor exclosures were exposed to cues from an egg predator (freshwater leeches; Nephelopsis obscura), a larval predator (dragonfly nymphs, Aeschna canadensis), and both predators in a 2 x 2 factorial experiment, and changes in hatchling size, hatchling developmental stage, and hatching time were compared to those for control embryos. Leeches alone induced embryos to hatch at a smaller size and an earlier developmental stage than controls, while dragonfly nymphs elicited a delay in egg hatching time that was associated with larger size and later developmental stage at hatching. Embryos failed to respond to simultaneous exposure to both predators, implying that responses to each occurred concurrently and were therefore dampened. Our results indicate that prey under threat from conflicting predators may manifest intermediate defensive phenotypes. Such intermediate responses may result in elevated rates of prey mortality with possible consequences at the population level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17216211     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0637-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.298


  10 in total

Review 1.  Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species.

Authors:  A A Agrawal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Adaptive plasticity in hatching age: a response to predation risk trade-offs.

Authors:  K M Warkentin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Costs and limits of dosage response to predation risk: to what extent can tadpoles invest in anti-predator morphology?

Authors:  Céline Teplitsky; Sandrine Plénet; Pierre Joly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Delayed hatching of salamander eggs in response to enhanced larval predation risk.

Authors:  A Sih; R D Moore
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Opposite shifts in size at metamorphosis in response to larval and metamorph predators.

Authors:  James R Vonesh; Karen M Warkentin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Predator-induced plasticity in early life history and morphology in two anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Anssi Laurila; Susanna Pakkasmaa; Pierre-André Crochet; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Importance of predator diet cues in responses of larval wood frogs to fish and invertebrate predators.

Authors:  D P Chivers; R S Mirza
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Wasp predation and wasp-induced hatching of red-eyed treefrog eggs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Density-dependent effects of multiple predators sharing a common prey in an endophytic habitat.

Authors:  Brian H Aukema; Murray K Clayton; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Dissecting the smell of fear from conspecific and heterospecific prey: investigating the processes that induce anti-predator defenses.

Authors:  Heather M Shaffery; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Should I stay or should I go: predator- and conspecific-induced hatching in a marine snail.

Authors:  Benjamin G Miner; Deborah A Donovan; Kelley E Andrews
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Maternal body condition influences magnitude of anti-predator response in offspring.

Authors:  Amanda M Bennett; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Disturbance cues function as a background risk cue but not as an associative learning cue in tadpoles.

Authors:  Ita A E Rivera-Hernández; Adam L Crane; Michael S Pollock; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Phenotypically plastic neophobia: a response to variable predation risk.

Authors:  Grant E Brown; Maud C O Ferrari; Chris K Elvidge; Indar Ramnarine; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The Origin and Ecological Function of an Ion Inducing Anti-Predator Behavior in Lithobates Tadpoles.

Authors:  Cayla E Austin; Raymond E March; Naomi L Stock; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Predation risk affects growth and reproduction of an invasive snail and its lethal effect depends on prey size.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Pablo R Martín; Chunxia Zhang; Jia-En Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Damselfly eggs alter their development rate in the presence of an invasive alien cue but not a native predator cue.

Authors:  Andrzej Antoł; Szymon Sniegula
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Investment into defensive traits by anuran prey (Lithobates pipiens) is mediated by the starvation-predation risk trade-off.

Authors:  Amanda M Bennett; David Pereira; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.