OBJECTIVE: To assess a sigmoidal equation for describing airway closure. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight piglets mechanically ventilated on zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP). INTERVENTIONS: Control and lung saline lavage. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Lungs were inflated up to transpulmonary pressure of 30 cmH(2)O at constant flow (0.12l s(-1)) then deflated at the same flow rate up to the point at which oesophageal pressure was constant, which was assumed to represent complete airway closure. The deflation volume-transpulmonary pressure curve was fitted to: (1) a sigmoidal equation focusing on inflexion point and pressure at maximal compliance increase and (2) an exponential equation above an inflexion point determined by eyeballing. Data deviate from the exponential equation at the point of airway closure onset. The zero-volume intercept was determined. Complete airway closure was reached at -8.3+/-3.5cmH(2)O in control conditions and at -1.3+/-3.7 cmH(2)O after lavage (p < 0.05). Between control and lavage, onset of airway closure was 3.0+/-1.9 vs. 6.0+/-2.8 cmH(2)O (p <0.05), inflexion point 3.2+/-1.8 vs. 7.7+/-2.6 cmH(2)O (p <0.001), pressure at maximal compliance increase -1.9+/-0.7 vs. -0.03+/-2.1cmH(2)O (p <0.05) and zero-volume intercept -1.5+/-1.4 vs. 0.3+/-2.3cmH(2)O (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation airways stay open and close around ZEEP in control but are closed above ZEEP after lavage. Inflexion point might reflect onset of airways closure in control. Pressure at maximal compliance increase was not a marker of complete airways closure. In control and lavage, pressure at maximal compliance increase and zero-volume intercept were reasonably equivalent.
OBJECTIVE: To assess a sigmoidal equation for describing airway closure. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight piglets mechanically ventilated on zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP). INTERVENTIONS: Control and lung saline lavage. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Lungs were inflated up to transpulmonary pressure of 30 cmH(2)O at constant flow (0.12l s(-1)) then deflated at the same flow rate up to the point at which oesophageal pressure was constant, which was assumed to represent complete airway closure. The deflation volume-transpulmonary pressure curve was fitted to: (1) a sigmoidal equation focusing on inflexion point and pressure at maximal compliance increase and (2) an exponential equation above an inflexion point determined by eyeballing. Data deviate from the exponential equation at the point of airway closure onset. The zero-volume intercept was determined. Complete airway closure was reached at -8.3+/-3.5cmH(2)O in control conditions and at -1.3+/-3.7 cmH(2)O after lavage (p < 0.05). Between control and lavage, onset of airway closure was 3.0+/-1.9 vs. 6.0+/-2.8 cmH(2)O (p <0.05), inflexion point 3.2+/-1.8 vs. 7.7+/-2.6 cmH(2)O (p <0.001), pressure at maximal compliance increase -1.9+/-0.7 vs. -0.03+/-2.1cmH(2)O (p <0.05) and zero-volume intercept -1.5+/-1.4 vs. 0.3+/-2.3cmH(2)O (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation airways stay open and close around ZEEP in control but are closed above ZEEP after lavage. Inflexion point might reflect onset of airways closure in control. Pressure at maximal compliance increase was not a marker of complete airways closure. In control and lavage, pressure at maximal compliance increase and zero-volume intercept were reasonably equivalent.
Authors: Frederique Bayle; Claude Guerin; Jean-Paul Viale; Jean-Christophe Richard; Guy Annat Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-09-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: P Pelosi; M Goldner; A McKibben; A Adams; G Eccher; P Caironi; S Losappio; L Gattinoni; J J Marini Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Daniel De Backer; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerôme Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 17.440