Literature DB >> 16601822

The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia.

Beth A O'Brien1, J Stephen Mansfield, Gordon E Legge.   

Abstract

This article details a study which predicted that across a wide range of print sizes dyslexic reading would follow the same curve shape as skilled reading, with constant reading rates across large print sizes and a sharp decline in reading rates below a critical print size. It also predicted that dyslexic readers would require larger critical print sizes to attain their maximum reading speeds, following the letter position coding deficit hypothesis. Reading speed was measured across twelve print sizes ranging from Snellen equivalents of 20/12 to 20/200 letter sizes for a group of dyslexic readers in Grades 2 to 4 (aged 7 to 10 years), and for non-dyslexic readers in Grades 1 to 3 (aged 6 to 8 years). The groups were equated for word reading ability. Results confirmed that reading rate-by-print size curves followed the same two-limbed shape for dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers. Dyslexic reading curves showed higher critical print sizes and shallower reading rate-by-print size slopes below the critical print size, consistent with the hypothesis of a letter-position coding deficit. Non-dyslexic reading curves also showed a decrease of critical print size with age. A developmental lag model of dyslexic reading does not account for the results, since the regression of critical print size on maximum reading rate differed between groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16601822      PMCID: PMC1427019          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00273.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Read        ISSN: 0141-0423


  39 in total

1.  Is dyslexia caused by a visual deficit?

Authors:  B C Skottun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reading at a distance: implications for the design of text in children's big books.

Authors:  Laura E Hughes; Arnold J Wilkins
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2002-06

3.  Sensory processing, reading, IQ, and attention.

Authors:  Jacqueline Hulslander; Joel Talcott; Caroline Witton; John DeFries; Bruce Pennington; Sally Wadsworth; Erik Willcutt; Richard Olson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2004-07

4.  The development of reading speed in Italians with dyslexia: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  P E Tressoldi; G Stella; M Faggella
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

5.  Is there a deficit of early vision in dyslexia?

Authors:  P U Walther-Müller
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; S J Ahn; T S Klitz; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Flicker contrast sensitivity in normal and specifically disabled readers.

Authors:  F Martin; W Lovegrove
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  W K Estes; J L Brunn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

Review 9.  Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research.

Authors:  G R Lyon; L C Moats
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

10.  Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; M Best; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

1.  Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Chiara Barbiero; Andrea Facoetti; Isabella Lonciari; Marco Carrozzi; Marcella Montico; Laura Bravar; Florence George; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  What's the story? The tale of reading fluency told at speed.

Authors:  Christopher F A Benjamin; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Children and monkeys overestimate the size of high-contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Oral reading after treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Christina Cheng; Christina Vu; David R Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Monocular oral reading performance after amblyopia treatment in children.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Susan A Cotter; Jonathan M Holmes; Robert W Arnold; William F Astle; Nicholas A Sala; D Robbins Tien
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Developmental changes in the visual span for reading.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Brock R Dubbels
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Evaluation of spatial anisotropy by curvature analysis of elliptical targets.

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Giulio Piana; Franco Anselmino
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2010-05-31

9.  E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Chen Chen; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: bigger is not always better.

Authors:  Tami Katzir; Shirley Hershko; Vered Halamish
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.