Literature DB >> 16600863

Evaluation of a shape-based model of human face discrimination using FMRI and behavioral techniques.

Xiong Jiang1, Ezra Rosen, Thomas Zeffiro, John Vanmeter, Volker Blanz, Maximilian Riesenhuber.   

Abstract

Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying object recognition is one of the fundamental challenges of visual neuroscience. While neurophysiology experiments have provided evidence for a "simple-to-complex" processing model based on a hierarchy of increasingly complex image features, behavioral and fMRI studies of face processing have been interpreted as incompatible with this account. We present a neurophysiologically plausible, feature-based model that quantitatively accounts for face discrimination characteristics, including face inversion and "configural" effects. The model predicts that face discrimination is based on a sparse representation of units selective for face shapes, without the need to postulate additional, "face-specific" mechanisms. We derive and test predictions that quantitatively link model FFA face neuron tuning, neural adaptation measured in an fMRI rapid adaptation paradigm, and face discrimination performance. The experimental data are in excellent agreement with the model prediction that discrimination performance should asymptote as faces become dissimilar enough to activate different neuronal populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16600863     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  56 in total

1.  Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity.

Authors:  Xiong Jiang; Evan Bradley; Regina A Rini; Thomas Zeffiro; John Vanmeter; Maximilian Riesenhuber
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The roles of visual expertise and visual input in the face inversion effect: behavioral and neurocomputational evidence.

Authors:  Joseph P McCleery; Lingyun Zhang; Liezhong Ge; Zhe Wang; Eric M Christiansen; Kang Lee; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Distinguishing conjoint and independent neural tuning for stimulus features with fMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel M Drucker; Wesley Thomas Kerr; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Defining the face processing network: optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Greet Kayaert; Edit Franko; Joris Vangeneugden; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

9.  A Flexible Neural Representation of Faces in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Runnan Cao; Xin Li; Alexander Todorov; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-28

10.  Local response heterogeneity indexes experience-based neural differentiation in reading.

Authors:  Jeremy J Purcell; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.