Literature DB >> 16600678

Transient motor evoked potential suppression following a complex sensorimotor task.

M N McDonnell1, M C Ridding.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mechanism involved in the transient suppression of the response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) following repeated performance of a complex sensorimotor training task (ST).
METHODS: A total of 19 healthy subjects participated in 4 experiments, all involving performance of the grooved pegboard test (GPT). The experiments investigated the effect of the ST on corticospinal and intracortical excitability, spinal excitability and maximal pinch grip force.
RESULTS: Motor evoked potential amplitude decreased significantly following the ST in both muscles tested and this was associated, but not correlated, with a decrease in the time taken to perform the GPT. There was no change in intracortical inhibition or facilitation (tested at interstimulus intervals of 3 and 10 ms, respectively). M wave amplitude was unchanged, as were F wave amplitude, latency and persistence and there was no evidence of muscle fatigue.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in corticospinal excitability was short lasting (<10 min) and was not accompanied by changes at the spinal or peripheral level, suggesting that other intracortical circuits may be involved. SIGNIFICANCE: Repeated performance of motor tasks can result in both short- and long-term modulation of motor cortical excitability. However, the relationship between changes in corticospinal excitability and motor performance is complex and critically dependent upon task type and duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16600678     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  12 in total

Review 1.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Corticospinal correlates of fast and slow adaptive processes in motor learning.

Authors:  Adjmal M E Sarwary; Miles Wischnewski; Dennis J L G Schutter; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cortical effects of repetitive finger flexion- vs. extension-resisted tracking movements: a TMS study.

Authors:  Sasha B Godfrey; Peter S Lum; Evan Chan; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor cortex plasticity and visuomotor skill learning in upper and lower limbs of endurance-trained cyclists.

Authors:  Brodie J Hand; George M Opie; Simranjit K Sidhu; John G Semmler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Orlando B Swayne; Yves Vandermeeren; Mickael Camus; Michael A Dimyan; Michelle Harris-Love; Monica A Perez; Patrick Ragert; John C Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Intermanual transfer and bilateral cortical plasticity is maintained in older adults after skilled motor training with simple and complex tasks.

Authors:  Daina S E Dickins; Martin V Sale; Marc R Kamke
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  A tool for balance control training using muscle synergies and multimodal interfaces.

Authors:  D Galeano; F Brunetti; D Torricelli; S Piazza; J L Pons
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A Day Awake Attenuates Motor Learning-Induced Increases in Corticomotor Excitability.

Authors:  Toon T de Beukelaar; Jago Van Soom; Reto Huber; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Do Differences in Levels, Types, and Duration of Muscle Contraction Have an Effect on the Degree of Post-exercise Depression?

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Decrease in short-latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement.

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Ryoki Sasaki; Shinichi Kotan; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.