Literature DB >> 16599935

Genetics of sex pheromone blend differences between Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa: a chromosome mapping approach.

A L Sheck1, A T Groot, C M Ward, C Gemeno, J Wang, C Brownie, C Schal, F Gould.   

Abstract

Males of the noctuid moths, Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa locate mates based on species-specific responses to female-emitted pheromones that are composed of distinct blends of volatile compounds. We conducted genetic crosses between these two species and used AFLP marker-based mapping of backcross families (H. subflexa direction) to determine which of the 30 autosomes in these moths contained quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling the proportion of specific chemical components in the pheromone blends. Presence/absence of single H. virescens chromosomes accounted for 7-34% of the phenotypic variation among backcross females in seven pheromone components. For a set of three similar 16-carbon acetates, two H. virescens chromosomes interacted in determining their relative amounts within the pheromone gland and together accounted for 53% of the phenotypic variance. Our results are discussed relative to theories about population genetic processes and biochemical mechanisms involved in the evolution of new sexual communication systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16599935     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00999.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  15 in total

1.  On the scent of pleiotropy.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential attraction of Heliothis subflexa males to synthetic pheromone lures in Eastern US and Western Mexico.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Richard G Santangelo; Emmarita Ricci; Cavell Brownie; Fred Gould; Coby Schal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Age and mating status do not affect transcript levels of odorant receptor genes in male antennae of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa.

Authors:  Stephanie Soques; Gissella M Vásquez; Christina M Grozinger; Fred Gould
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The genetic architecture of ecological adaptation: intraspecific variation in host plant use by the lepidopteran crop pest Chloridea virescens.

Authors:  Sara J Oppenheim; Fred Gould; Keith R Hopper
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Joy L Horovitz; Jennifer Hamilton; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic mapping of male pheromone response in the European corn borer identifies candidate genes regulating neurogenesis.

Authors:  Fotini A Koutroumpa; Astrid T Groot; Teun Dekker; David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.

Authors:  Daniel J Hemmann; Jeremy D Allison; Kenneth F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The genetic architecture of a complex ecological trait: host plant use in the specialist moth, Heliothis subflexa.

Authors:  Sara J Oppenheim; Fred Gould; Keith R Hopper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Construction and sequence sampling of deep-coverage, large-insert BAC libraries for three model lepidopteran species.

Authors:  Chengcang Wu; Dina Proestou; Dorothy Carter; Erica Nicholson; Filippe Santos; Shaying Zhao; Hong-Bin Zhang; Marian R Goldsmith
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Transcriptome analysis of the sex pheromone gland of the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Heiko Vogel; Andrew J Heidel; David G Heckel; Astrid T Groot
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.