Literature DB >> 16598620

[Left ventricular electromechanical latency period is an additional indicator to upgrade from right to biventricular DDD pacing].

B Ismer1, T Körber, G H von Knorre, W Voss, D Burska, C A Nienaber.   

Abstract

In DDD pacing, the left-ventricular electromechanical latency period defines the duration between premature ventricular stimulation and the prematurely ending left-atrial contribution to left-ventricular filling. It has to be considered in diastolic AV delay optimization. Individual duration of this parameter seemed to reflect the ventricular function. Therefore, we compared the left-ventricular electromechanical latency period due to right ventricular stimulus with the documented ejection fraction of two groups, 33 congestive heart failure patients carrying biventricular systems and 13 right ventricular paced bradycardia patients. A mean latency period of 168+/-26 ms was found in the heart failure patients (ejection fraction: 25+/-5%) which was significantly longer (p=0.0039) compared to the bradycardia patients (ejection fraction: 51+/-12%) with a mean latency of 119+/-13 ms. Thus, an increasing latency period during right ventricular DDD pacing therapy indicates decreasing ejection fraction. A cut-off interval of 135 ms allowed the discrimination of 93% of our patients as having an individual ejection fraction of either up to 35% or above. Thus, the left ventricular electromechanical latency period can be used as an additional parameter indicating the necessity to upgrade from right to biventricular DDD pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598620     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-006-1106-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  7 in total

1.  The Doppler-derived myocardial performance index is determined by both left ventricular systolic and diastolic function as well as by afterload and left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Lars Lind; Bertil Andrén; Johan Arnlöv
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.724

2.  Tei-index in patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure.

Authors:  C Bruch; A Schmermund; D Marin; M Katz; T Bartel; J Schaar; R Erbel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

Authors:  P Ritter; L Padeletti; L Gillio-Meina; G Gaggini
Journal:  Europace       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Prediction of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers.

Authors:  T Ishikawa; S Sumita; K Kimura; M Kikuchi; M Kosuge; N Kuji; T Endo; T Sugano; T Sigemasa; I Kobayashi; O Tochikubo; T Usui
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function--a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  C Tei; L H Ling; D O Hodge; K R Bailey; J K Oh; R J Rodeheffer; A J Tajik; J B Seward
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of dual-chamber pacing with short atrioventricular delay in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  S J Brecker; H B Xiao; J Sparrow; D G Gibson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study.

Authors:  M R Gold; Z Feliciano; S S Gottlieb; M L Fisher
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 24.094

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Transesophageal left ventricular electrogram-recording and temporary pacing to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  Matthias Heinke; Bruno Ismer; Helmut Kühnert; Hans R Figulla
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.