Literature DB >> 10527018

Prediction of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers.

T Ishikawa1, S Sumita, K Kimura, M Kikuchi, M Kosuge, N Kuji, T Endo, T Sugano, T Sigemasa, I Kobayashi, O Tochikubo, T Usui.   

Abstract

In patients with an implanted DDD pacemaker (PM), the atrial contribution may be interrupted by too short an atrioventricular (AV) delay, and filling time may be shortened by too long an AV delay. The AV delay at which the end of the A wave on transmitral flow coincides with complete closure of the mitral valve may be optimal. The subjects were 15 patients [70.3+/-12.3 (SD) years old] with an implanted DDD PM. Cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were measured by Swan-Ganz catheter. Transmitral flow was recorded by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. AV delay was prolonged stepwise by 25 msc. When the AV delay was set at 155+/-26 ms, the end of the A wave coincided with complete closure of the mitral valve. When the AV delay was prolonged 25, 50, 75, and 100 ms from this AV delay, the interval between the end of the A wave and complete closure of mitral the valve was prolonged 16+/-5, 39+/-6, 65+/-4 and 88+/-5 ms, respectively (r = 0.97, P<0.0001) and diastolic mitral regurgitation was observed during this period. Thus, the optimal AV delay may be predicted as follows: the slightly prolonged AV delay minus the interval between the end of the A wave and complete closure of the mitral valve. When the AV delay was set at 215 ms, there was a significant positive correlation between the predicted optimal AV delay (166+/-23 ms) and the optimal AV delay (CO: 161+/-26 msec, r = 0.93, P<0.0001, PCWP: 161+/-28 msec, r = 0.95, P<0.0001). In conclusion, optimal AV delay can be predicted by this simple formula: slightly prolonged AV delay minus the interval between end of A wave and complete closure of mitral valve at the AV delay setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527018     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00630.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of echocardiography and device based algorithm for atrio-ventricular delay optimization in heart block patients.

Authors:  Rajesh Vijayvergiya; Ankur Gupta
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  [Echocardiographic evaluation to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy].

Authors:  A C Borges; F Knebel; S Eddicks; H-J Bondke; G Baumann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2006

3.  [Left ventricular electromechanical latency period is an additional indicator to upgrade from right to biventricular DDD pacing].

Authors:  B Ismer; T Körber; G H von Knorre; W Voss; D Burska; C A Nienaber
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Strategies for pacemaker programming in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Marc K Lahiri; Justin T Mao; Claudio D Schuger
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Evaluating the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy performed with a new ventricular morphology-based strategy for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Aya Miyazaki; Jun Negishi; Yosuke Hayama; Shigehito Baba; Yu Matsumura; Yuriko Shima; Etusko Tsuda; Heima Sakaguchi; Takaya Hoashi; Koji Kagisaki; Takashi Noda; Hiraku Doi; Hajime Ichikawa; Hideo Ohuchi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

7.  Acute haemodynamic benefits of biatrial atrioventricular sequential pacing: comparison with single atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing.

Authors:  A Doi; M Takagi; I Toda; M Yoshiyama; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Strain dyssynchrony index determined by three-dimensional speckle area tracking can predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Tatsumi; Hidekazu Tanaka; Takayuki Tsuji; Akihiro Kaneko; Keiko Ryo; Kohei Yamawaki; Alaa M S Omar; Yuko Fukuda; Kazuko Norisada; Kensuke Matsumoto; Tetsuari Onishi; Akihiro Yoshida; Hiroya Kawai; Ken-ichi Hirata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  AV timing in pacemaker patients with first-degree AV block: which is preferable, intrinsic AV conduction or pacing?

Authors:  Yoshihiro Aizawa; Toshiko Nakai; Yukitoshi Ikeya; Rikitake Kogawa; Yuki Saito; Kazuto Toyama; Tetsuro Yumikura; Naoto Otsuka; Koichi Nagashima; Yasuo Okumura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Influence of the atrio-ventricular delay optimization on the intra left ventricular delay in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Melzer; Fabian Knebel; Bruno Ismer; Hansjürgen Bondke; Christoph A Nienaber; Gert Baumann; Adrian C Borges
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.