Literature DB >> 16597846

Effects of delayed-entry conditions on the recovery and detection of microorganisms from BacT/ALERT and BACTEC blood culture bottles.

R L Sautter1, A R Bills, D L Lang, G Ruschell, B J Heiter, P P Bourbeau.   

Abstract

Manufacturers generally recommend that blood culture bottles be loaded into instruments within a short time of collection. However, in our experience, delays often occur prior to loading the bottles. We examined the effect of holding bottles under various temperatures (T)-room temperature (RT), 4 degrees C, 37 degrees C, and RT for 2 h following incubation at 37 degrees C (to simulate transit [TR])-and for various holding times of 4, 12, and 24 h. We utilized the BacT/ALERT system with FA and FN bottles and the BACTEC system with Plus (PL) and Lytic 10 (LY) bottles. Standardized inocula and 5 ml of blood were added to each bottle. Fifteen organisms were evaluated based upon expected performance: aerobic (FA and PL), anaerobic (FN and LY 10), and facultative (all bottles). Based upon expected performance, the FA and FN bottles recovered 458 of 468 organisms and 282 of 288 organisms, respectively, whereas the PL and LY bottles recovered 453 of 468 organisms and 257 of 288 organisms, respectively (P = <0.001, FN versus LY). There were 3, 11, 21, and 27 false-negative results for bottles held at 4 degrees C, RT, 37 degrees C, and TR, respectively. There were 4, 8, and 50 false-negative results for bottles held for 4, 12, and 24 h, respectively. Our results support holding these four bottle types at 4 degrees C or at RT for up to 24 h and at 37 degrees C for up to 12 h. We propose that manufacturers only need to make claims for "delayed entry" when these bottles are held for more than 24 h at 4 degrees C or at RT or for more than 12 h at 37 degrees C.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16597846      PMCID: PMC1448626          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1245-1249.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

1.  Bactec 9240 blood culture system: to preincubate at 35 degrees C or not?

Authors:  L Lemming; H M Holt; I S Petersen; C Østergaard; B Bruun
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Comparison of Bactec 9240 and Difco ESP blood culture systems for detection of organisms from vials whose entry was delayed.

Authors:  K Chapin; T L Lauderdale
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  H G Klaerner; U Eschenbach; K Kamereck; N Lehn; H Wagner; T Miethke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Sensitivity of the BacT/ALERT FA-medium for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in pre-incubated blood cultures and its temperature-dependence.

Authors:  Irene Seegmüller; Ursula Eschenbach; Klaus Kamereck; Thomas Miethke
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.472

  4 in total
  18 in total

1.  Clinical impact of preincubation of blood cultures at 37°C.

Authors:  Lieven B van der Velden; Fidel J Vos; Johan W Mouton; Patrick D Sturm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Molecular diagnosis of sepsis: New aspects and recent developments.

Authors:  O Liesenfeld; L Lehman; K-P Hunfeld; G Kost
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 3.  Developments for improved diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections.

Authors:  A J M Loonen; P F G Wolffs; C A Bruggeman; A J C van den Brule
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Immediate incubation of blood cultures outside routine laboratory hours of operation accelerates antibiotic switching.

Authors:  J J Kerremans; A K van der Bij; W Goessens; H A Verbrugh; M C Vos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid real-time nucleic Acid sequence-based amplification-molecular beacon platform to detect fungal and bacterial bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Yanan Zhao; Steven Park; Barry N Kreiswirth; Christine C Ginocchio; Raphaël Veyret; Ali Laayoun; Alain Troesch; David S Perlin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis.

Authors:  Nicasio Mancini; Silvia Carletti; Nadia Ghidoli; Paola Cichero; Roberto Burioni; Massimo Clementi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Measurement of microbial DNA polymerase activity enables detection and growth monitoring of microbes from clinical blood cultures.

Authors:  Daniel R Zweitzig; Nichol M Riccardello; John Morrison; Jason Rubino; Jennifer Axelband; Rebecca Jeanmonod; Bruce I Sodowich; Mark J Kopnitsky; S Mark O'Hara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Growth dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a function of time to detection in BacT/alert 3D blood culture bottles with various preincubation conditions.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Eun-Ha Koh; Sae-Rom Choi; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Impact of Pre-Analytical Time on the Recovery of Pathogens from Blood Cultures: Results from a Large Retrospective Survey.

Authors:  Claudia Venturelli; Elena Righi; Lucia Borsari; Gabriella Aggazzotti; Stefano Busani; Cristina Mussini; Fabio Rumpianesi; Gian Maria Rossolini; Massimo Girardis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.