Literature DB >> 15606636

Bactec 9240 blood culture system: to preincubate at 35 degrees C or not?

L Lemming1, H M Holt, I S Petersen, C Østergaard, B Bruun.   

Abstract

Bactec Plus blood culture bottles were preincubated at 35 degrees C or at room temperature before entry into the Bactec 9240 instrument to determine the influence of preincubation temperature and time. Of 463 positive blood culture sets, 956 bottles were positive, of which the instrument detected 92.1%. Of 76 positive bottles undetected by the instrument, 68 were preincubated at 35 degrees C and eight at room temperature. The median entry delay and instrument detection times were 17.9 and 7.2 h for preincubated bottles, and 16.4 and 13.4 h for bottles held at room temperature. Short entry delay and inspection before entry into the instrument are necessary if preincubation at 35 degrees C is used.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15606636     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00969.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  7 in total

1.  Clinical impact of preincubation of blood cultures at 37°C.

Authors:  Lieven B van der Velden; Fidel J Vos; Johan W Mouton; Patrick D Sturm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effects of delayed-entry conditions on the recovery and detection of microorganisms from BacT/ALERT and BACTEC blood culture bottles.

Authors:  R L Sautter; A R Bills; D L Lang; G Ruschell; B J Heiter; P P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Reduced length of hospital stay through a point of care placed automated blood culture instrument.

Authors:  M J Bruins; M J Egbers; T M Israel; S H A Diepeveen; M J H M Wolfhagen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Impact of 24/7 loading of blood culture bottles in a new automated incubator on the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Gauthier Péan de Ponfilly; H Benmansour; V Manda; E Lecorche; F Mougari; A L Munier; S Temim; R Amarsy; H Jacquier; E Cambau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Impact of Pre-Analytical Time on the Recovery of Pathogens from Blood Cultures: Results from a Large Retrospective Survey.

Authors:  Claudia Venturelli; Elena Righi; Lucia Borsari; Gabriella Aggazzotti; Stefano Busani; Cristina Mussini; Fabio Rumpianesi; Gian Maria Rossolini; Massimo Girardis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Microbiology service centralization: a step too far.

Authors:  S J Dancer; C Varon-Lopez; O Moncayo; A Elston; H Humphreys
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.926

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.