Literature DB >> 10698992

Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria.

H G Klaerner1, U Eschenbach, K Kamereck, N Lehn, H Wagner, T Miethke.   

Abstract

During a 1-year study we observed that both aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles from patients were negative by the BacT/Alert system during a 7-day incubation period. However, upon subcultivation of negative bottles, growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detectable. In an attempt to explain this observation, aerobic BacT/Alert Fan bottles were seeded with a defined inoculum (0.5 McFarland standard; 1 ml) of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, or Acinetobacter baumannii. Half of the inoculated bottles were loaded into the BacT/Alert system immediately, and the remainder were preincubated for 4, 8, 16, and 24 h at 36 degrees C. With preincubation all bottles seeded with the Enterobacteriaceae signaled positive during the next 1.5 h. Organisms in bottles seeded with the nonfermentative species P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii remained undetected by the BacT/Alert system for 7 days. S. maltophilia was detected if the preincubation time was equal or less than 8 h. Without preincubation all bottles seeded with the Enterobacteriaceae or nonfermentative species signaled positive. Since nonfermentative species seem to enter a state of bacteriostasis within the preincubation period, we reasoned that an unknown factor is consumed. Accordingly, a smaller inoculum should allow the detection of nonfermentative species, even after preincubation, and serial dilutions of P. aeruginosa were detected in preincubated bottles. In this case preincubated bottles signaled positive faster than bottles without preincubation. We conclude that all bottles from clinical settings should be subcultured prior to loading to avoid false negatives. An alternative may be preincubation at room temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10698992      PMCID: PMC86332     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results.

Authors:  M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.

Authors:  R Ziegler; I Johnscher; P Martus; D Lenhardt; H M Just
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Microbiological factors influencing the outcome of nosocomial bloodstream infections: a 6-year validated, population-based model.

Authors:  D Pittet; N Li; R F Woolson; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  Blood cultures: issues and controversies.

Authors:  J A Washington; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct

5.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; M L Towns; S M Quartey; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; G Parmigiani; L B Reller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240.

Authors:  J T Shigei; J A Shimabukuro; M T Pezzlo; L M de la Maza; E M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital.

Authors:  J A Smith; E A Bryce; J H Ngui-Yen; F J Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clinical correlations of serial quantitative blood cultures determined by lysis-centrifugation in patients with persistent septicemia.

Authors:  E Whimbey; B Wong; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  N E Meessen; H G de Vries-Hospers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of Gram staining on blood cultures flagged negative by an automated blood culture system.

Authors:  A Peretz; N Isakovich; N Pastukh; A Koifman; T Glyatman; D Brodsky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Effects of delayed-entry conditions on the recovery and detection of microorganisms from BacT/ALERT and BACTEC blood culture bottles.

Authors:  R L Sautter; A R Bills; D L Lang; G Ruschell; B J Heiter; P P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Apparent culture-negative prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Peptostreptococcus magnus.

Authors:  E R van der Vorm; A M Dondorp; R J van Ketel; J Dankert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Fetal Tissues Tested for Microbial Sterility by Culture- and PCR-Based Methods Can be Safely Used in Clinics.

Authors:  Yakov Vitrenko; Iryna Kostenko; Kateryna Kulebyakina; Alla Duda; Mariya Klunnyk; Khrystyna Sorochynska
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Growth dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a function of time to detection in BacT/alert 3D blood culture bottles with various preincubation conditions.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Eun-Ha Koh; Sae-Rom Choi; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Impact of Pre-Analytical Time on the Recovery of Pathogens from Blood Cultures: Results from a Large Retrospective Survey.

Authors:  Claudia Venturelli; Elena Righi; Lucia Borsari; Gabriella Aggazzotti; Stefano Busani; Cristina Mussini; Fabio Rumpianesi; Gian Maria Rossolini; Massimo Girardis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of delayed entry on performance of the BACT/ALERT FAN PLUS bottles in the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO blood culture system.

Authors:  Mary Adamik; Anne Hutchins; Jasmin Mangilit; Betsy Katzin; Heather Totty; Parampal Deol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Microbiology service centralization: a step too far.

Authors:  S J Dancer; C Varon-Lopez; O Moncayo; A Elston; H Humphreys
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.