Literature DB >> 16597592

Retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-identical sibling donors in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Rodrigo Martino1, Simona Iacobelli, Ronald Brand, Thekla Jansen, Anja van Biezen, Jürgen Finke, Andrea Bacigalupo, Dietrich Beelen, Jossy Reiffers, Agnes Devergie, Emilie Alessandrino, Ghulam J Mufti, Renée Barge, Jorge Sierra, Tapani Ruutu, Marc Boogaerts, Michele Falda, Jean-Pierre Jouet, Dieter Niederwieser, Theo de Witte.   

Abstract

In this multicenter retrospective study, the outcomes of 836 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent transplantation with a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donor were analyzed according to 2 types of conditioning: reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) in 215 patients, and standard myeloablative (or high-dose) conditioning (SMC) in 621 patients. In multivariate analysis, the 3-year relapse rate was significantly increased after RIC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.2-2.2; P = .001), but the 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was decreased in the RIC group (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.91; P = .015). The 3-year probabilities of progression-free and overall survivals were similar in both groups (39% after SMC vs 33% in RIC; multivariate P = .9; and 45% vs 41%, respectively; P = .8). In conclusion, the lower 3-year NRM after RIC is encouraging, since these patients were older (age > 50 years in 73% RIC vs 28% in SMC, P < .001) and had more adverse pretransplantation variables. However, based on the higher risk of relapse, patients with no contraindications for SMC should not receive RIC outside of prospective randomized trials, which are needed to establish the position of RIC-based transplantation in the treatment of patients with MDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16597592     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  95 in total

Review 1.  New ways to use DNA methyltransferase inhibitors for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Steven D Gore
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Who is fit for allogeneic transplantation?

Authors:  H Joachim Deeg; Brenda M Sandmaier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Myelodysplastic syndromes--many new drugs, little therapeutic progress.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  When to transplant MDS, and what to do when transplant fails.

Authors:  Katja Sockel; Uwe Platzbecker
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Dose intensification of busulfan in the preparative regimen is associated with improved survival: a phase I/II controlled, randomized study.

Authors:  Simrit Parmar; Gabriela Rondon; Marcos de Lima; Peter Thall; Ronald Bassett; Paolo Anderlini; Partow Kebriaei; Issa Khouri; Prasanth Ganesan; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Daily practice management of myelodysplastic syndromes in France: data from 907 patients in a one-week cross-sectional study by the Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies.

Authors:  Charikleia Kelaidi; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Emmanuel Raffoux; Bruno Quesnel; Agnes Guerci; François Dreyfus; Sabine Brechignac; Christian Berthou; Thomas Prebet; Yosr Hicheri; Maya Hacini; Jacques Delaunay; Marie-Pierre Gourin; Jean-Marie Camo; Hacene Zerazhi; Anne-Laure Taksin; Laurence Legros; Bachra Choufi; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  Principles and overview of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Michael R Bishop
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2009

8.  Response and toxicity of donor lymphocyte infusions following T-cell depleted non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic SCT from 3-6/6 HLA matched donors.

Authors:  D A Rizzieri; P Dev; G D Long; C Gasparetto; K M Sullivan; Ml Horwitz; J Chute; N J Chao
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Conditioning intensity in secondary AML with prior myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative disorders: an EBMT ALWP study.

Authors:  Salyka Sengsayadeth; Katie S Gatwood; Ariane Boumendil; Myriam Labopin; Jürgen Finke; Arnold Ganser; Matthias Stelljes; Gerhard Ehninger; Dietrich Beelen; Dietger Niederwieser; Didier Blaise; Peter Dreger; Ghulam Mufti; Patrice Chevallier; Audrey Mailhol; Maria H Gilleece; Norbert Gorin; Jordi Esteve; Fabio Ciceri; Frederic Baron; Christoph Schmid; Sebastian Giebel; Mohamad Mohty; Bipin N Savani; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-08-28

10.  Toxicity and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine myeloablative conditioning for HLA-identical sibling allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in AML and MDS.

Authors:  J De La Serna; J Sanz; A Bermúdez; M Cabrero; D Serrano; C Vallejo; V Gómez; J M Moraleda; S G Perez; M D Caballero; E Conde; J J Lahuerta; G Sanz
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.