BACKGROUND: There is little published information on the everyday clinical management of myelodysplastic syndromes in real world practice. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all patients with myelodysplastic syndromes attending 74 French centers in a 1-week period for inpatient admission, day-hospital care or outpatient visits. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seven patients were included; 67.3% had lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (International Prognostic Scoring System: low or intermediate-1). Karyotype had been analyzed in 82.5% of the cases and was more often of intermediate or poor risk in patients under 65 years old compared with those who were older. Red blood cell transfusions accounted for as many as 31.4% of the admissions. Endogenous erythropoietin level was less than 500 IU/L in 88% of the patients tested. Erythroid stimulating agents had been or were being used in 36.8% of the lower risk patients, iron chelation in 31% of lower risk patients requiring red blood cell transfusions and lenalidomide in 41% of lower risk patients with del 5q. High-dose chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, low dose cytarabine and allogeneic stem cell transplantation had been or were being used in 14.8%, 31.1%, 8.8% and 5.1%, respectively, of higher-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Karyotype is now assessed in most patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, and patients under 65 years old may have more aggressive disease. Apart from erythroid-stimulating agents and, in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, hypomethylating agents, specific treatments are used in a minority of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and red blood cell transfusions still represent the major reason for hospital admission.
BACKGROUND: There is little published information on the everyday clinical management of myelodysplastic syndromes in real world practice. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all patients with myelodysplastic syndromes attending 74 French centers in a 1-week period for inpatient admission, day-hospital care or outpatient visits. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seven patients were included; 67.3% had lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (International Prognostic Scoring System: low or intermediate-1). Karyotype had been analyzed in 82.5% of the cases and was more often of intermediate or poor risk in patients under 65 years old compared with those who were older. Red blood cell transfusions accounted for as many as 31.4% of the admissions. Endogenous erythropoietin level was less than 500 IU/L in 88% of the patients tested. Erythroid stimulating agents had been or were being used in 36.8% of the lower risk patients, iron chelation in 31% of lower risk patients requiring red blood cell transfusions and lenalidomide in 41% of lower risk patients with del 5q. High-dose chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, low dose cytarabine and allogeneic stem cell transplantation had been or were being used in 14.8%, 31.1%, 8.8% and 5.1%, respectively, of higher-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Karyotype is now assessed in most patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, and patients under 65 years old may have more aggressive disease. Apart from erythroid-stimulating agents and, in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, hypomethylating agents, specific treatments are used in a minority of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and red blood cell transfusions still represent the major reason for hospital admission.
Authors: L Mannone; C Gardin; M C Quarre; J F Bernard; D Vassilieff; L Ades; S Park; S Vaultier; F Hamza; M O Beyne-rauzy; S Cheze; S Giraudier; P Agape; L Legros; L Voillat; F Dreyfus; P Fenaux Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: P Greenberg; C Cox; M M LeBeau; P Fenaux; P Morel; G Sanz; M Sanz; T Vallespi; T Hamblin; D Oscier; K Ohyashiki; K Toyama; C Aul; G Mufti; J Bennett Journal: Blood Date: 1997-03-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Frederick R Appelbaum; Holly Gundacker; David R Head; Marilyn L Slovak; Cheryl L Willman; John E Godwin; Jeanne E Anderson; Stephen H Petersdorf Journal: Blood Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M Hebbar; C Kaplan; M T Caulier; E Wattel; P Morel; M Wetterwald; F Bauters; P Fenaux Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Philippe Armand; Haesook T Kim; Corey S Cutler; Vincent T Ho; John Koreth; Edwin P Alyea; Robert J Soiffer; Joseph H Antin Journal: Blood Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: J Douglas Rizzo; Mark R Somerfield; Karen L Hagerty; Jerome Seidenfeld; Julia Bohlius; Charles L Bennett; David F Cella; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Matthew J Goode; Ann A Jakubowski; Mark U Rarick; David H Regan; Alan E Lichtin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel F Pease; Julie A Ross; Jenny N Poynter; Phuong L Nguyen; Betsy Hirsch; Adina Cioc; Michelle A Roesler; Erica D Warlick Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Michael Pfeilstöcker; Heinz Tuechler; Guillermo Sanz; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Alessandro Levis; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Mikkael A Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase; Peter L Greenberg Journal: Blood Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 22.113