RATIONALE: Quinpirole (QNP), a D2/D3 dopaminergic receptor agonist, was found to elicit an apparently antieconomical drinking behavior called contrafreeloading (CFL). The perseverative operant responding observed may represent a compulsive-like behavior prompted by sensitization to the effects of QNP. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we investigated the effect of different response costs on instrumental behavior and CFL in rats repeatedly treated with QNP (0.5 mg/kg i.p.). Moreover, we studied the consummatory components of ingestive behavior in no-choice paradigms and the role of learned operant conditioning in free drinking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In experiment 1, rats were trained to perform under three different fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement (FR1, FR3, and FR10) and were given a choice between operant and free access to water. In experiment 2, rats were divided into four groups, each one resembling experiment 1 in one or more features, with no choice available and water consumption measured at an interval of 0-60 min. RESULTS: (a) Increasing FR significantly reduced CFL % in saline -- but not in QNP-injected groups; (b) under free-drinking conditions, QNP caused a progressive hypodipsic effect which was, however, contrasted by maintaining cues formerly contingent on operant access to water; and (c) under CFL conditions QNP-treated rats drank more than under free access conditions. CONCLUSIONS: QNP confers rigidity in responding for water, impeding adaptation to different contingencies for access to the resource. In QNP-treated rats, CFL behavior appears adaptive as far as it allows animals to partially circumvent the hypodipsic effect of the drug.
RATIONALE: Quinpirole (QNP), a D2/D3 dopaminergic receptor agonist, was found to elicit an apparently antieconomical drinking behavior called contrafreeloading (CFL). The perseverative operant responding observed may represent a compulsive-like behavior prompted by sensitization to the effects of QNP. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we investigated the effect of different response costs on instrumental behavior and CFL in rats repeatedly treated with QNP (0.5 mg/kg i.p.). Moreover, we studied the consummatory components of ingestive behavior in no-choice paradigms and the role of learned operant conditioning in free drinking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In experiment 1, rats were trained to perform under three different fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement (FR1, FR3, and FR10) and were given a choice between operant and free access to water. In experiment 2, rats were divided into four groups, each one resembling experiment 1 in one or more features, with no choice available and water consumption measured at an interval of 0-60 min. RESULTS: (a) Increasing FR significantly reduced CFL % in saline -- but not in QNP-injected groups; (b) under free-drinking conditions, QNP caused a progressive hypodipsic effect which was, however, contrasted by maintaining cues formerly contingent on operant access to water; and (c) under CFL conditions QNP-treated rats drank more than under free access conditions. CONCLUSIONS:QNP confers rigidity in responding for water, impeding adaptation to different contingencies for access to the resource. In QNP-treated rats, CFL behavior appears adaptive as far as it allows animals to partially circumvent the hypodipsic effect of the drug.
Authors: Henry Szechtman; Susanne E Ahmari; Richard J Beninger; David Eilam; Brian H Harvey; Henriette Edemann-Callesen; Christine Winter Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 8.989