Literature DB >> 16596449

Mind the gap: analysis of marker-assisted breeding strategies for inbred mouse strains.

Nicola J Armstrong1, Thomas C Brodnicki, Terence P Speed.   

Abstract

The development of congenic mouse strains is the principal approach for confirming and fine mapping quantitative trait loci, as well as for comparing the phenotypic effect of a transgene or gene-targeted disruption between different inbred mouse strains. The traditional breeding scheme calls for at least nine consecutive backcrosses before establishing a congenic mouse strain. Recent availability of genome sequence and high-throughput genotyping now permit the use of polymorphic DNA markers to reduce this number of backcrosses, and empirical data suggest that marker-assisted breeding may require as few as four backcrosses. We used simulation studies to investigate the efficiency of different marker-assisted breeding schemes by examining the trade-off between the number of backcrosses, the number of mice produced per generation, and the number of genotypes per mouse required to achieve a quality congenic mouse strain. An established model of crossover interference was also incorporated into these simulations. The quality of the strain produced was assessed by the probability of an undetected region of heterozygosity (i.e., "gaps") in the recipient genetic background, while maintaining the desired donor-derived interval. Somewhat surprisingly, we found that there is a relatively high probability for undetected gaps in potential breeders for establishing a congenic mouse strain. Marker-assisted breeding may decrease the number of backcross generations required to generate a congenic strain, but only additional backcrossing will guarantee a reduction in the number and length of undetected gaps harboring contaminating donor alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16596449     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-005-0123-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  52 in total

1.  Size of donor chromosome segments around introgressed loci and reduction of linkage drag in marker-assisted backcross programs.

Authors:  F Hospital
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Progress in high throughput SNP genotyping methods.

Authors:  Z Tsuchihashi; N C Dracopoli
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 3.  Congenic strains developed for alcohol- and drug-related phenotypes.

Authors:  B Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains.

Authors:  P Markel; P Shu; C Ebeling; G A Carlson; D L Nagle; J S Smutko; K J Moore
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  F Hospital; A Charcosset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.

Authors:  E Foss; R Lande; F W Stahl; C M Steinberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome-tagged mice (GTM): two sets of genome-wide congenic strains.

Authors:  O A Iakoubova; C L Olsson; K M Dains; D A Ross; A Andalibi; K Lau; J Choi; I Kalcheva; M Cunanan; J Louie; V Nimon; M Machrus; L G Bentley; C Beauheim; S Silvey; J Cavalcoli; A J Lusis; D B West
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 8.  Alcohol and genetics: new models.

Authors:  John C Crabbe
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12-08

9.  A linkage map of mouse chromosome 12: localization of Igh and effects of sex and interference on recombination.

Authors:  R D Blank; G R Campbell; A Calabro; P D'Eustachio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Congenic mice: cutting tools for complex immune disorders.

Authors:  Ute C Rogner; Philip Avner
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 53.106

View more
  18 in total

1.  Genetic variation in C57BL/6 ES cell lines and genetic instability in the Bruce4 C57BL/6 ES cell line.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Hughes; Yun Yan Qu; Suzanne J Genik; Robert H Lyons; Christopher D Pacheco; Andrew P Lieberman; Linda C Samuelson; Igor O Nasonkin; Sally A Camper; Margaret L Van Keuren; Thomas L Saunders
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Genetic modifiers as relevant biological variables of eye disorders.

Authors:  Kacie J Meyer; Michael G Anderson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Audiogenic seizure proneness requires the contribution of two susceptibility loci in mice.

Authors:  M Catharine Jawahar; Carolina I Sari; Yvette M Wilson; Andrew J Lawrence; Thomas Brodnicki; Mark Murphy
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 2.660

Review 4.  Influence of allelic differences in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Randall J Roper; Laura Hawley; Charles R Goodlett
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Quantitative trait locus analysis for hemostasis and thrombosis.

Authors:  Qila Sa; Erika Hart; Annie E Hill; Joseph H Nadeau; Jane L Hoover-Plow
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  C(3)1-TAg in C57BL/6 J background as a model to study mammary tumor development.

Authors:  Isadora F G Sena; Beatriz G S Rocha; Caroline C Picoli; Gabryella S P Santos; Alinne C Costa; Bryan O P Gonçalves; Ana Paula V Garcia; Maryam Soltani-Asl; Leda M C Coimbra-Campos; Walison N Silva; Pedro A C Costa; Mauro C X Pinto; Jaime H Amorim; Vasco A C Azevedo; Rodrigo R Resende; Debora Heller; Geovanni D Cassali; Akiva Mintz; Alexander Birbrair
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.304

7.  Accelerating the inbreeding of multi-parental recombinant inbred lines generated by sibling matings.

Authors:  Catherine E Welsh; Leonard McMillan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Multigenic nature of the mouse pulmonary adenoma progression 1 locus.

Authors:  Alice Dassano; Sara Noci; Federica Galbiati; Francesca Colombo; Gaia Trincucci; Angela Pettinicchio; Tommaso A Dragani; Giacomo Manenti
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Congenic mice provide evidence for a genetic locus that modulates spontaneous arthritis caused by deficiency of IL-1RA.

Authors:  Yanhong Cao; Xiaoyun Liu; Nan Deng; Yan Jiao; Yonghui Ma; Karen A Hasty; John M Stuart; Weikuan Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A high-speed congenic strategy using first-wave male germ cells.

Authors:  Narumi Ogonuki; Kimiko Inoue; Michiko Hirose; Ikuo Miura; Keiji Mochida; Takahiro Sato; Nathan Mise; Kazuyuki Mekada; Atsushi Yoshiki; Kuniya Abe; Hiroki Kurihara; Shigeharu Wakana; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.