Literature DB >> 17828574

Genetic variation in C57BL/6 ES cell lines and genetic instability in the Bruce4 C57BL/6 ES cell line.

Elizabeth D Hughes1, Yun Yan Qu, Suzanne J Genik, Robert H Lyons, Christopher D Pacheco, Andrew P Lieberman, Linda C Samuelson, Igor O Nasonkin, Sally A Camper, Margaret L Van Keuren, Thomas L Saunders.   

Abstract

Genetically modified mouse strains derived from embryonic stem (ES) cells are powerful tools for gene function analysis. ES cells from the C57BL/6 mouse strain are not widely used to generate mouse models despite the advantage of a defined genetic background. We assessed genetic variation in six such ES cell lines with 275 SSLP markers. Compared to C57BL/6, Bruce4 differed at 34 SSLP markers and had significant heterozygosity on three chromosomes. BL/6#3 and Dale1 ES cell lines differed at only 3 SSLP makers. The C2 and WB6d ES cell lines differed at 6 SSLP markers. It is important to compare the efficiency of producing mouse models with available C57BL/6 ES cells relative to standard 129 mouse strain ES cells. We assessed genetic stability (the tendency of cells to become aneuploid) in 110 gene-targeted ES cell clones from the most widely used C57BL/6 ES cell line, Bruce4, and 710 targeted 129 ES cell clones. Bruce4 clones were more likely to be aneuploid and unsuitable for ES cell-mouse chimera production. Despite their tendency to aneuploidy and consequent inefficiency, use of Bruce4 ES cells can be valuable for models requiring behavioral studies and other mouse models that benefit from a defined C57BL/6 background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17828574     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-007-9054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  47 in total

1.  Gene trapping methods for the identification and functional analysis of cell surface proteins in mice.

Authors:  W C Skarnes
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Strain-dependent differences in LTP and hippocampus-dependent memory in inbred mice.

Authors:  P V Nguyen; T Abel; E R Kandel; R Bourtchouladze
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production.

Authors:  Anna B Auerbach; Rada Norinsky; Weilan Ho; Kasia Losos; Qiuxia Guo; Samprit Chatterjee; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Unusual behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J N Crawley
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Use of coisogenic host blastocysts for efficient establishment of germline chimeras with C57BL/6J ES cell lines.

Authors:  K Schuster-Gossler; A W Lee; C P Lerner; H J Parker; V W Dyer; V E Scott; A Gossler; J C Conover
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.993

6.  Formation of germ-line chimeras from embryonic stem cells maintained with recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor.

Authors:  S Pease; R L Williams
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype.

Authors:  D W Threadgill; A A Dlugosz; L A Hansen; T Tennenbaum; U Lichti; D Yee; C LaMantia; T Mourton; K Herrup; R C Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The knockout mouse project.

Authors:  Christopher P Austin; James F Battey; Allan Bradley; Maja Bucan; Mario Capecchi; Francis S Collins; William F Dove; Geoffrey Duyk; Susan Dymecki; Janan T Eppig; Franziska B Grieder; Nathaniel Heintz; Geoff Hicks; Thomas R Insel; Alexandra Joyner; Beverly H Koller; K C Kent Lloyd; Terry Magnuson; Mark W Moore; Andras Nagy; Jonathan D Pollock; Allen D Roses; Arthur T Sands; Brian Seed; William C Skarnes; Jay Snoddy; Philippe Soriano; David J Stewart; Francis Stewart; Bruce Stillman; Harold Varmus; Lyuba Varticovski; Inder M Verma; Thomas F Vogt; Harald von Melchner; Jan Witkowski; Richard P Woychik; Wolfgang Wurst; George D Yancopoulos; Stephen G Young; Brian Zambrowicz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  A Nagy; J Rossant; R Nagy; W Abramow-Newerly; J C Roder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Gene targeting in mice: a review.

Authors:  Hicham Bouabe; Klaus Okkenhaug
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

2.  Behavioral differences among C57BL/6 substrains: implications for transgenic and knockout studies.

Authors:  Camron D Bryant; Nanci N Zhang; Greta Sokoloff; Michael S Fanselow; Helena S Ennes; Abraham A Palmer; James A McRoberts
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.250

3.  Reprogramming in vivo produces teratomas and iPS cells with totipotency features.

Authors:  María Abad; Lluc Mosteiro; Cristina Pantoja; Marta Cañamero; Teresa Rayon; Inmaculada Ors; Osvaldo Graña; Diego Megías; Orlando Domínguez; Dolores Martínez; Miguel Manzanares; Sagrario Ortega; Manuel Serrano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  New approaches for characterization of the genetic stability of vaccine cell lines.

Authors:  Siemon Ng; Lucy Gisonni-Lex; Ali Azizi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Evidence that Cd101 is an autoimmune diabetes gene in nonobese diabetic mice.

Authors:  Daniel B Rainbow; Carolyn Moule; Heather I Fraser; Jan Clark; Sarah K Howlett; Oliver Burren; Mikkel Christensen; Val Moody; Charles A Steward; Javid P Mohammed; Michael E Fusakio; Emma L Masteller; Erik B Finger; J P Houchins; Dieter Naf; Frank Koentgen; William M Ridgway; John A Todd; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Laurence B Peterson; Jochen Mattner; Linda S Wicker
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  SAG/RBX2/ROC2 E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for vascular and neural development by targeting NF1 for degradation.

Authors:  Mingjia Tan; Yongchao Zhao; Sun-Jung Kim; Margaret Liu; Lijun Jia; Thomas L Saunders; Yuan Zhu; Yi Sun
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Conditional Niemann-Pick C mice demonstrate cell autonomous Purkinje cell neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Matthew J Elrick; Chris D Pacheco; Ting Yu; Nahid Dadgar; Vikram G Shakkottai; Christopher Ware; Henry L Paulson; Andrew P Lieberman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Efficient generation of germ line transmitting chimeras from C57BL/6N ES cells by aggregation with outbred host embryos.

Authors:  Marina Gertsenstein; Lauryl M J Nutter; Tammy Reid; Monica Pereira; William L Stanford; Janet Rossant; Andras Nagy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Production of p53 gene knockout rats by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Chang Tong; Ping Li; Nancy L Wu; Youzhen Yan; Qi-Long Ying
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Combining sperm plug genotyping and coat color chimerism predicts germline transmission.

Authors:  Angus Yiu-Fai Lee; Kristin Evans; Brandon Willis; K C Kent Lloyd
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.