Literature DB >> 32057311

Influence of allelic differences in Down syndrome.

Randall J Roper1, Laura Hawley2, Charles R Goodlett3.   

Abstract

Both trisomic and non-trisomic genes may affect the incidence and severity of phenotypes associated with Down syndrome (DS). The importance of extra (trisomic) genetic material is emphasized in DS, with less emphasis to the allelic composition of candidate trisomic genes in defining the trisomic gene-phenotype relationship in DS. Allelic differences in non-trisomic genes have been shown to be important moderators of cardiac, leukemia, and developmental phenotypes associated with DS. Trisomic mouse models provide an in vivo genetic platform for examining the gene-phenotype relationship, including the influence of allelic variants, on DS-like phenotypes. DS mouse models have differing trisomic genetic makeup, and optimal development, viability and translational value of these mouse models may require a non-inbred genetic background with heterogeneity at many loci. Additionally, understanding the contribution of specific genes or regions to DS phenotypes often requires the utilization of genetically manipulated mice that may be established on a different inbred background than the trisomic mice. The impact of allelic differences of trisomic and background genes in human and model systems may offer insight into the variability in occurrence and severity of trisomic phenotypes.
© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allelic variation; Down syndrome; Mouse models; Phenotypic variability; Trisomy 21

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32057311      PMCID: PMC7500172          DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  83 in total

Review 1.  Too much of a good thing: mechanisms of gene action in Down syndrome.

Authors:  R H Reeves; L L Baxter; J T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Segmental trisomy of murine chromosome 16: a new model system for studying Down syndrome.

Authors:  M T Davisson; C Schmidt; E C Akeson
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Down syndrome and the complexity of genome dosage imbalance.

Authors:  Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Mind the gap: analysis of marker-assisted breeding strategies for inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Nicola J Armstrong; Thomas C Brodnicki; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Distinct GATA1 Point Mutations in Monozygotic Twins With Down Syndrome and Transient Abnormal Myelopoiesis From a Triplet Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Liqun Yin; Mark A Lovell; Michael L Wilson; Qi Wei; Xiayuan Liang
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Complex contributions of Ets2 to craniofacial and thymus phenotypes of trisomic "Down syndrome" mice.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hill; Thomas E Sussan; Roger H Reeves; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  The "Down syndrome critical region" is sufficient in the mouse model to confer behavioral, neurophysiological, and synaptic phenotypes characteristic of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Nadia P Belichenko; Pavel V Belichenko; Alexander M Kleschevnikov; Ahmad Salehi; Roger H Reeves; William C Mobley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Behavioral validation of the Ts65Dn mouse model for Down syndrome of a genetic background free of the retinal degeneration mutation Pde6b(rd1).

Authors:  Alberto C S Costa; Melissa R Stasko; Cecilia Schmidt; Muriel T Davisson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Analysis of Copy Number Variants on Chromosome 21 in Down Syndrome-Associated Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Benjamin L Rambo-Martin; Jennifer G Mulle; David J Cutler; Lora J H Bean; Tracie C Rosser; Kenneth J Dooley; Clifford Cua; George Capone; Cheryl L Maslen; Roger H Reeves; Stephanie L Sherman; Michael E Zwick
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.542

10.  Slightly deleterious genomic variants and transcriptome perturbations in Down syndrome embryonic selection.

Authors:  Konstantin Popadin; Stephan Peischl; Marco Garieri; M Reza Sailani; Audrey Letourneau; Federico Santoni; Samuel W Lukowski; Georgii A Bazykin; Sergey Nikolaev; Diogo Meyer; Laurent Excoffier; Alexandre Reymond; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  2 in total

1.  Behavioral Phenotyping for Down Syndrome in Mice.

Authors:  Randall J Roper; Charles R Goodlett; María Martínez de Lagrán; Mara Dierssen
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2020-09

2.  Longitudinal neuroanatomical and behavioral analyses show phenotypic drift and variability in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Patricia R Shaw; Jenny A Klein; Nadine M Aziz; Tarik F Haydar
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 5.758

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.