Literature DB >> 16595072

Human SNPs resulting in premature stop codons and protein truncation.

Sevtap Savas1, Sukru Tuzmen, Hilmi Ozcelik.   

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) constitute the most common type of genetic variation in humans. SNPs introducing premature termination codons (PTCs), herein called X-SNPs, can alter the stability and function of transcripts and proteins and thus are considered to be biologically important. Initial studies suggested a strong selection against such variations/mutations. In this study, we undertook a genome-wide systematic screening to identify human X-SNPs using the dbSNP database. Our results demonstrated the presence of 28 X-SNPs from 28 genes with known minor allele frequencies. Eight X-SNPs (28.6 per cent) were predicted to cause transcript degradation by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Seventeen X-SNPs (60.7 per cent) resulted in moderate to severe truncation at the C-terminus of the proteins (deletion of >50 per cent of the amino acids). The majority of the X-SNPs (78.6 per cent) represent commonly occurring SNPs, by contrast with the rarely occurring disease-causing PTC mutations. Interestingly, X-SNPs displayed a non-uniform distribution across human populations: eight X-SNPs were reported to be prevalent across three different human populations, whereas six X-SNPs were found exclusively in one or two population(s). In conclusion, we have systematically investigated human SNPs introducing PTCs with respect to their possible biological consequences, distributions across different human populations and evolutionary aspects. We believe that the SNPs reported here are likely to affect gene/protein function, although their biological and evolutionary roles need to be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16595072      PMCID: PMC3500177          DOI: 10.1186/1479-7364-2-5-274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genomics        ISSN: 1473-9542            Impact factor:   4.639


Introduction

The Human Genome Project revealed the presence of a large number of genetic variations among individuals. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common genetic variation; they occur, on average, once in every 400 - 1,000 base pairs along DNA [1-4]. The term 'polymorphism' traditionally refers to commonly occurring genetic variations (minor allele frequency approximately ≥ 1 per cent) in the population [5]. The density of SNPs varies among different genomic regions, and is thought to be dependent on both the mutation rate and the selective constraints on the region [6]. Currently, there is a strong interest in SNPs because they are hypothesised to contribute to differential disease risk and drug/treatment response among individuals [7,8]. SNPs located in the coding regions of genes may have important biological consequences. For example, non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) change the amino acid sequence and thus may affect protein function. Although many approaches and systematic analyses have been undertaken to identify nsSNPs with possible biological significance [9-12], to our knowledge no large-scale systematic analysis has been carried out to identify and characterise SNPs that introduce premature termination codons (PTCs; herein called X-SNPs). Both frameshift and nonsense mutations can lead to the introduction of PTCs along the open reading frames. As a result of PTCs, the stability of transcripts or proteins may be directly affected [13,14]. Alternatively, the truncated proteins may act in a dominant-negative fashion [15]. Thus, the PTCs can lead to either loss-of-function or gain-of-function by altering the stability and function of the transcripts/proteins. The Mendelian human diseases are associated with highpenetrant disease-causing genetic alterations that are found in very low frequencies (approximately < 1 per cent) in the population, most likely due to strong selection against them [16]. In inherited human genetic disorders, approximately one-third of mutations introduce PTCs[17] that are considered to be deleterious. Similarly, the number of SNPs introducing PTCs in the human genome is estimated to be fairly low, and a previous study suggested the presence of strong evolutionary selection against X-SNPs [18]. Therefore, disease-related or not, the PTCs are considered dramatically to affect proteins leading to potential biological abnormalities. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the polymorphisms introducing PTCs in the human genome with respect to their potential biological consequences, distributions across different human populations and minor allele frequencies. As more X-SNPs are discovered and deposited in public SNP databases, it will be possible to analyse a larger number of X-SNPs and obtain more comprehensive data. Nevertheless, our results do provide an interesting and unique catalogue of polymorphisms that deserves further biological and epidemiological disease-association studies.

Methods

SNPs

SNPs annotated 'premature termination codon SNPs' were retrieved from the dbSNP database build 120 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/) [19]. We have annotated such SNPs as X-SNPs throughout this paper. There was a total of 977 X-SNPs in the dbSNP database; however, only 119 of them were presented with minor allele frequency information. Among these SNPs, only the ones that were found in at least two chromosomes with a sample size of ≥ 20 chromosomes were further analysed (herein annotated as validated X-SNPs). The X-SNPs that are located on the transcripts annotated as 'predictions', 'pseudogenes', 'similar to' or 'open reading frames' were excluded from this study. In total, 28 X-SNPs were in agreement with all of the above requirements.

BLAST analyses

To map the SNP sequences on transcripts, SNP-flanking sequences of X-SNPs were blasted against the transcripts in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/Genbank/)[20] using the BLAST against gene transcripts tool (http://lpgws.nci.nih. gov:80/perl/blast2/) [21], as explained by Savas et al [22] One mismatch in the SNP-flanking sequence/transcript alignment was allowed. The SNP-flanking sequences were also blasted against the human genome using the NCBI BLAST tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/)[23] to ensure that the SNP sequences are not derived from multiple genomic regions [24], as explained in a further paper by Savas et al. [25]

Alternatively spliced transcript variants (ASTVs)

Information relating to ASTVs was retrieved from the Ref Seq resource of NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/RefSeq/) [26].

Candidate transcripts for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

Blasting the transcript sequence against the human genome identified the genomic structures of transcripts. The subsequent manual analysis of the exon - intron boundaries identified X-SNPs that can lead to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD): the transcripts with an SNP introducing a PTC located ≥ 50 nucleotides upstream of an exon - intron junction are considered candidates to undergo NMD [13,27-29]. Blasting the transcript sequence against the human genome identified the genomic structures of transcripts. The subsequent manual analysis of the exon - intron boundaries identified X-SNPs that can lead to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD): the transcripts with an SNP introducing a PTC located ≥ 50 nucleotides upstream of an exon - intron junction are considered candidates to undergo NMD [13,27-29].

Results and discussion

Possible biological consequences of X-SNPs

Our systematic search of the dbSNP database[19] (build 120) yielded 28 validated X-SNPs from 28 genes (Table 1). Twenty-three genes bearing X-SNPs were found to code for a single transcript; however, the remaining five X-SNPs were found in genes undergoing alternative splicing: DSCR8- K79X, HPS4-R246X, IL17RB-Q484X, OAS2-W720X and TAP2-Q687X. With the exception of HPS4-R246X, all X-SNPs were mapped onto an ASTV coding for the longest protein isoform. For 22/28 X-SNPs, genotype information was available in the dbSNP database. As a result, for 12 X-SNPs, at least one homozygous sample was reported, suggesting that these X-SNPs do not affect the fitness per se (see below; Table 1). In the remaining cases, genotyping of larger sample sets may help in elucidating whether the homozygous state is deleterious (ie the homozygotes are not viable) or whether the low allele frequency makes it hard to detect the homozygotes in small populations.
Table 1

Validated X-SNPs in the human genome.

GeneaGene functionbAccession #LocationcSNP IDdFrequencyeHomozygosityX-SNPfProtein length (truncation)gNMDhCpG
AGTCell signalling; hypertensionNM_000029.11q42-q43rs5039CEPH-MULTI-NATIONAL 184 chr.G = 1.000 A = 0.000HYP1-MULTI-NATIONAL 80 chr.G = 0.950 A = 0.050n/aQ53X485(89%)++

APOC4Lipid metabolismNM_001646.119q13.2rs5164CEPH-MULTI-NATIONAL 184 chr.G = 1.000 A = 0.000HYP1-MULTI-NATIONAL 80 chr.G = 0.950 A = 0.050-W47X127(63%)+-

CDH15Cell adhesion; morphogenetic processesNM_004933.216q24.3rs2270416JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1500 chr. G = 0.826T = 0.174n/aY788X814(3.2%)-+

CLCA3TransportNM_004921.11p31-p22rs2292830JBIC-allele -EAST ASIA 1462 chr. G = 0.569C = 0.431n/aY84X262(67.3%)--

CYP2C19Transport; drug metabolism and synthesis of lipidsNM_000769.110q24.1-q24.3rs4986893PAC1-EAST ASIA 46 chr. G = 0.913A = 0.087CAUC1-MULTI-NATIONAL 60 chr.G = 1.000 A = 0.000AFR1-MULTI-NATIONAL 48 chr. G = 0.979A = 0.021HISP1-CENTRAL/SOUTH AMERICA 44chr. G = 1.000 A = 0.000P1-MULTI-NATIONAL 198 chr. G = 0.975A = 0.025n/aW212X446(52.5%)--

DSCR8UnknownNM_032589.221q22.2rs2836172NCBI|NIHPDR-NORTH AMERICA 20 chr. A = 0.900 T = 0.100AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. A = 1.000AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46chr. A = 0.783 T = 0.217AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. A = 0.854 T = 0.146+K79X91(13.2%)--

EPHX1Aromatic compound catabolism; xenobiotic metabolismNM_000120.21q42.1rs4986931PAC1-EAST ASIA 46 chr. A = 0.978 G = 0.022 P1-MULTI-NATIONAL 202 chr. A = 0.990 G = 0.010 CAUC1-MULTI-NATIONAL 62 chr.A = 1.000 G = 0.000AFR1-MULTI-NATIONAL 48 chr. A = 1.000G = 0.000HISP1-CENTRAL/SOUTH AMERICA 46 chr. A = 0.978 G = 0.022-W97X455 (78.7%)+-

FUT2Carbohydrate metabolism; protein glycosylationNM_000511.119q|3.3rs1800030PAC1-EAST ASIA 48 chr. G = 0.979 A = 0.021 P1-MULTI-NATIONAL 202 chr. G = 0.995A = 0.005CAUC1-MULTI-NATIONAL 60 chr. G = 1.000 A = 0.000AFR1-MULTI-NATIONAL 48 chr.G = 1.000 A = 0.000HISP1-CENTRAL/SOUTH AMERICA 46 chr. G = 1.000 A = 0.000-W297X346(14.2%)--

HPS4Organelle biogenesis; protein stabilisation/targetingNM_152843.122cen--q|2.3rs3747129JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1492 chr. G = 0.798 A = 0.202 AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48 chr. G = 0.812 A = 0.188 AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46 chr. G = 0.978 A = 0.022AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. G = 0.750 A = 0.250HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. G = 0.825 A = 0.175+R246X528(53.4%)-+

IL17RBImmuno-regulatory activity; regulation of cell growthNM_018725.23p2|.1rs1043261JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1476 chr. C = 0.902 T = 0.098 HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. C = 0.908 T = 0.092 AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48 chr. C = 0.938 T = 0.062AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46chr. C = 0.978 T = 0.022AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. C = 0.792 T = 0.208+Q484X502(3.6%)-+

KRTAP1-1Cytoskeleton; intermediate filamentsNM_030967.217q12-q21rs3213755JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 708 chr. C = 0.617 T = 0.383 HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. G = 0.800 A = 0.200+Q51X177(71.2%)--

LCE5AUnknownNM_178438.11q21.3rs2282298JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1504 chr. G = 0.979 A = 0.021 AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. C = 1.000AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 46 chr. C = 1.000AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. C = 0.896 T = 0.104-R79X118(33.1%)-+

LIG4DNA repair; cell cycleNM_206937.113q33-q34rs2232636PAC1-EAST ASIA 46 chr. G = 1.000 A = 0.000 P1-MULTI-NATIONAL 202 chr. G = 0.995 A = 0.005CAUC1-MULTI-NATIONAL 62 chr.G = 1.000 A = 0.000AFR1-MULTI-NATIONAL 48 chr.G = 0.979 A = 0.021HISP1-CENTRAL/SOUTH AMERICA 46 chr. G = 1.000 A = 0.000-W46X911(95%)--

LPLLipoprotein metabolismNM_000237.18p22rs328WIAF-CSNP-MITOGPOP5-MULTI-NATI-ONAL 112 chr. C = 0.982 G = 0.018 JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1458 chr. C = 0.860G = 0.140CEPH-MULTI-NATIONAL 184 chr.C = 0.640G = 0.360AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 44chr. C = 0.727 G = 0.273AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 42chr. C = 0.952 G = 0.048AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46chr. C = 0.935 G = 0.065+S474X475(0.2%)--

MAGEE2UnknownNM_138703.2Xq13.3rs1343879TSC_42_C-NORTH AMERICA 84 chr. C = 0.950 A = 0.050 C_42_A-EAST ASIA 84 chr. A = 0.650C = 0.350TSC_42_AA-NORTHAMERICA 84 chr.C = 0.950 A = 0.050HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. C = 0.983 A = 0.017-E120X523(77.1%)--

MS4A12Signal transductionNM_017716.111q12rs2298553JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 726 chr. C = 0.585 T = 0.415 AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. C = 0.583 T = 0.417AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 42 chr. C = 0.548 T = 0.452AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. C = 0.542 T = 0.458+Q71X267(73.4%)+-

OAS2Immune responseNM_016817.112q24.2rs15895POOLED_CEPH-MULTI-NATIONAL 188 chr. A = 0.668 G = 0.332 CEPH-MULTI-NATIONAL 184 chr. C = 0.670 T = 0.330SC_12_A-EAST ASIA 20 chr. G = 1.000SC_12_AA-NORTH AMERICA 24 chr.G = 0.830 A = 0.170SC_12_C-NORTH AMERICA 24 chr.G = 0.710 A = 0.290SC_95_C-NORTH AMERICA 184 chr.C = 0.590 T = 0.410AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. G = 0.562 A = 0.438AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 46 chr. G = 0.913 A = 0.087AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. G = 1.000+W720X727(1%)--

OVCH2ProteolysisNM_198185.111p15.4rs4509745HapMap-CEU-EUROPE chr.120 T = 0.658C = 0.342HapMap-HCB-EAST ASIA 88 chr. T = 0.705C = 0.295HapMap-JPT-EAST ASIA 88 chr. T = 0.614C = 0.386HapMap-YRI-WEST AFRICA 120 chr.C = 0.783 T = 0.217AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 44chr. T = 0.568 C = 0.432AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46chr. C = 0.609 T = 0.391AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. T = 0.583 C = 0.417+W556X564(1.4%)--

POLE2DNA repairNM_002692.214q21- q22rs3218790NIHPDR-NORTH AMERICA 170 chr.A = 0.988 T = 0.012HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. A = 1.000HapMap-HCB-EAST ASIA 90 chr. A = 1.000HapMap-JPT-EAST ASIA 88 chr. A = 1.000HapMap-YRI-WEST AFRICA 120 chr.A = 1.000-K443X527(15.9%)+-

SER-PINB11Serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activityNM_080475.118rs4940595AfAm 12 chr. C = 0.667 A = 0.333Caucasian 24 chr. A = 0.667 C = 0.333Asian 12 chr. C = 0.667 A = 0.333CEPH 12 chr. C = 0.667 A = 0.333PDpanel 48 chr. A = 0.521 C = 0.479AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. T = 0.625 G = 0.375AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 44chr. G = 0.545 T = 0.455AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. G = 0.771 T = 0.229+E90X392(77%)+-

SMUG1DNA repairNM_014311.112q13.11-q13.3rs2233919NIHPDR-NORTH AMERICA 574 chr. C = 0.986 T = 0.014 PDR90 166 chr. C = 0.988 T = 0.012-Q3X270(98.9%)+-

SPTBN5Actin cytoskeleton organisation and biogenesisNM_016642.115q21rs2271286JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1482 chr. G = 0.951 A = 0.049-Q72X3674(98%)--

TAP2Immune response; protein transport and assemblyNM_000544.26p21.3rs241448CEPH-MULTI-NATIONAL 184 T = 0.700 C = 0.300 WIAF-CSNP-MITOGPOP5-MULTI-NATI-ONAL 48 chr. T = 0.812 C = 0.188+Q687X703(2.3%)--

TAAR9Signal transductionNM_175057.16q23.2rs2842899HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. T = 0.708 A = 0.292 HapMap-YRI-WEST AFRICA 120 chr. T = 0.883 A = 0.117AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. A = 0.812 T = 0.188AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46chr. A = 0.783 T = 0.217AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTHAMERICA 48 chr. A = 0.854 T = 0.146+Q61X348(82.5%)--

TLR5Immune responseNM_003268.31q41-q42rs5744168D-0-NORTH AMERICA 48 chr.C = 0.938 T = 0.062 E-0-NORTH AMERICA 40 chr. C = 0.925T = 0.075E-1-EUROPE 6 chr. C = 1.000-R392X858(54.3%)-+

TRPM1Cation transportNM_002420.315q13-q14rs3784589JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1502 chr. C = 0.965 A = 0.035 HapMap-CEU-EUROPE 120 chr. C = 0.942 A = 0.058HapMap-HCB-EAST ASIA 90 chr. C = 1.000 HapMap-JPT-EAST ASIA 88 chr. C = 0.955 A = 0.045HapMap-YRI-WEST AFRICA 118 chr. C = 0.958 A = 0.042AFD_EUR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr C = 0.917 A = 0.083AFD_AFR_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 46chr. C = 0.913 A = 0.087AFD_CHN_PANEL-NORTH AMERICA 48chr. C = 1.000+E1305X1533(14.9%)--

UNC93AUnknownNM_018974.26q27rs2235197JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1484 chr. G = 0.852 A = 0.148n/aW151X456(66.9%)--

ZNF34Gene expressionNM_030580.28q24.3rs2294120JBIC-allele-EAST ASIA 1494 chr. C = 0.729 T = 0.271n/aQ56X549(89.8%)++

Abbreviation: SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Gene functions are retrieved from the Entrez Gene database of NCBI [30].

The accession numbers onto which the SNP-flanking sequences have been located.

SNP ID corresponds to the dbSNP database SNP identifiers.

The frequency information is as posted in dbSNP build 124.

This information indicates whether or not a homozygous sample in a sample set was reported for the corresponding X-SNP and was collected from the dbSNP database 'summary of genotypes' section: 'n/a': no information was available, ' + ': homozygous genotype was reported, ' 2 ': no homozygous was reported.

Length of the wild-type protein products. In parentheses are the percentages of the protein truncation at the C-terminus caused by the X-SNP.

SNPs that may lead to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay are annotated by ' + '.

SNPs occurring at CpG dinucleotides and thus can be hot spot mutations are annotated by ' + '.

Validated X-SNPs in the human genome. Abbreviation: SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism. Gene functions are retrieved from the Entrez Gene database of NCBI [30]. The accession numbers onto which the SNP-flanking sequences have been located. SNP ID corresponds to the dbSNP database SNP identifiers. The frequency information is as posted in dbSNP build 124. This information indicates whether or not a homozygous sample in a sample set was reported for the corresponding X-SNP and was collected from the dbSNP database 'summary of genotypes' section: 'n/a': no information was available, ' + ': homozygous genotype was reported, ' 2 ': no homozygous was reported. Length of the wild-type protein products. In parentheses are the percentages of the protein truncation at the C-terminus caused by the X-SNP. SNPs that may lead to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay are annotated by ' + '. SNPs occurring at CpG dinucleotides and thus can be hot spot mutations are annotated by ' + '. We then carried out a theoretical evaluation of the possible biological consequences of the identified X-SNPs at the mRNA and protein levels. For example, NMD is a surveillance system that specifically eliminates transcripts that contain PTCs as a result of mutations in DNA or errors in RNA processing [15]. NMD usually requires a downstream intron and at least 50 - 55 nucleotides before the downstream exon - intron junction in order for a PTC to be recognised [27,28]. Based on the 50 - 55 nucleotide rule, we analysed the locations of the X-SNPs with respect to the exon - intron boundaries and predicted that eight (28.6 per cent) X-SNPs (AGT-Q53X, APOC4-W47X, EPHX1-W97X, MS4A12-Q71X, POLE2- K443X, SERPINB11-E90X, SMUG1-Q3X and ZNF34- Q56X) may potentially cause mRNA degradation via NMD. Thus, at least these eight X-SNPs are likely to result in loss of gene function. Exceptions to this rule have also been reported [17], however, which suggests that the proportion of PTC-containing mRNAs undergoing mRNA degradation may, in fact, be larger. The reported allele frequencies of these X-SNPs ranged from rare (AGT-Q53X 0 -5 per cent; APOC4-W47X 0 - 5 per cent; EPHX1-W97X 0 - 2.2 per cent; POLE2-K443X 0 - 1.2 per cent; SMUG1-Q3X 1.2 - 1.4 per cent) to common (MS4A12-Q71X 41.5 - 45.8 per cent; SERPINB11-E90X 22.9 - 52.1 per cent; ZNF34-Q56X 27 per cent) (Table 1). Individuals with a homozygous state for two of these X-SNPs, namely MS4A12-Q71X and SERPINB11-E90X, were reported in dbSNP submissions, suggesting that, in such individuals, the levels of these truncated protein products are likely to be reduced by the NMD mechanism. If no NMD occurs and the protein products are translated, then the PTCs lead to protein truncation at the C-terminus - the consequences of which vary depending on the degree of the truncation. For example, 17 (60.7 per cent) X-SNPs led to moderate to severe truncation at the C-terminus of the proteins (deletion of > 50 per cent of the amino acid sequence), which is likely radically to alter protein structure and function (Table 1, Figure 1). As an extreme example, SMUG1-Q3X, when translated, would yield only a two-amino acid peptide, which would presumably be non-functional (loss of function). Also, PTCs can destabilise the protein products by altering the protein-folding state or kinetics[14,31] and may cause proteolysis. In addition, they may act as dominant-negative mutations[15] or cause exon skipping and alter the open reading frame [32]. Alternatively, mRNA molecules bearing a PTC closer to the 5' end can be still translated if an in-frame translationable AUG start codon is present downstream of the PTC [33-35]. Such N-terminal truncated proteins can be fully or partially functional. For example, in the case of SMUG1-Q3X, there is an inframe AUG located at the 18th codon of the SMUG1 gene, which can be experimentally evaluated to determine if an N-terminal truncated SMUG1 protein is produced and functional. To summarise, the stability, structure and function of the protein products or transcripts may be affected by the X-SNPs described in this study, and experimental approaches are needed to evaluate their true biological effects.
Figure 1

Percentage truncation induced by the X-SNPs in the corresponding proteins. The X-SNPs that can cause mRNA degradation via NMD are indicated by * in the left margin of the histogram.

Percentage truncation induced by the X-SNPs in the corresponding proteins. The X-SNPs that can cause mRNA degradation via NMD are indicated by * in the left margin of the histogram.

Possible evolutionary explanations of common X-SNPs

The small number of validated X-SNPs identified suggests infrequent occurrence of the PTC-introducing variations in the human genome and thus agrees with the presence of selection against them [18]. By contrast with rare PTC-introducing mutations observed in human diseases, however, X-SNPs analysed in this study represented commonly occurring variations in humans: 22 X-SNPs (78.6 per cent) were found with minor allele frequencies of ≥ 5 per cent in at least one sample panel analysed (common X-SNPs) compared with only six rare X-SNPs (with < 5 per cent minor allele frequencies). How can we explain the abundance of such common (and perhaps deleterious) X-SNPs in the human population? Possible scenarios are summarised in Figure 2. For example, one explanation could be that the truncated protein product may still be functional in the presence of the X-SNP. For instance, LPL-S474X was located only one amino acid prior to the natural termination codon; thus, it may not really alter the protein properties and thus may not be deleterious to cell function at all. Alternatively, the protein may not be essential for the fitness of human beings; in this case, the evolutionary pressure is relieved, which can lead to toleration of an increase in allele frequency of premature stop codons in human populations.
Figure 2

How can we explain the allele frequencies of the X-SNPs? This figure presents a summary of possible biological consequences of X-SNPs. For simplicity, both deleterious and slightly deleterious variations are annotated as deleterious.

How can we explain the allele frequencies of the X-SNPs? This figure presents a summary of possible biological consequences of X-SNPs. For simplicity, both deleterious and slightly deleterious variations are annotated as deleterious. Another possibility is that X-SNPs may be capable of affecting protein function/the organism per se, but other factors might modify their effects. Here, we will assume that these PTCs represent both the strongly deleterious mutations that are a result of selection and quickly removed from the populations, as well as the slightly deleterious mutations that are subject to both selection and drift [36]. For example, these X-SNPs may be hot-spot mutations, where the new mutations introduce (slightly) deleterious alleles and thus increase the allele frequency, despite the selection. In order to assess whether some of these X-SNPs might in fact represent the hot-spot mutations, we analysed the immediate flanking sequences of each X-SNP. As a result, we found that 25 per cent (7/28) of X-SNPs (all common) had occurred at CpG dinucleotides (Table 1). These data suggest that these X-SNPs might have arisen from spontaneous deamination of methylcytosine leading to a thymine, and thus may represent hot-spot mutations [37]. Additionally, diploidy was suggested to relieve the tension of purifying selection and increase the tolerance for PTCs [38], which predicts a recessive effect or loss of function. All but one gene (MAGEE2) in Table 1 were located in autosomal chromosomes, which may also help to explain the frequency of the naturally occurring PTC polymorphisms in humans. Moreover, it is also likely that, even though (slightly) deleterious in a homozygous state, some X-SNPs can confer selective advantage to heterozygotes [39]. Alternatively, epistatic interactions of additional mutations, either on the same or different genes, may compensate for the (slightly) deleterious effects of the X-SNP [16,40]. Furthermore, X-SNPs may be beneficial at present conditions, which may favour the positive selection of the X-SNPs and increase their allele frequencies. Moreover, if a PTC is located at the 5' end of a gene and there is a nearby in-frame initiation codon after that PTC, then the protein translation can re-initiate and a peptide with aminotruncation may be produced [33-35]. Depending on the nature and extent of the truncation, the truncated peptide can fully or partially function and thus can, completely or to some extent, rescue the phenotype. There is a need for further studies to elucidate the molecular basis of the discrepancy and the determination of the biological differences between human disease-related mutations and naturally occurring stop codon-creating polymorphisms.

Frequency spectrum of X-SNPs in different human populations

Comparison of the population(s) and the minor allele frequencies of X-SNP entries in the dbSNP database[19] presented great variability across different human populations, at least in some cases (Table 1). For example, HSP4-R246X, IL17RB-Q484X, LPL-S474X, MS4A12-Q71X, OVCH2-W556X, SERPINB11-E90X, TAAR9-Q61X and TRPM1-E1305X were detected in samples from African, Asian and Caucasian backgrounds. This might mean that either these X-SNPs have been inherited from a common ancestor or they represent hot-spot mutations (HSP4-R246X and IL17RB Q484X occurred at CpG dinucleotides and thus might in fact be hot-spot mutations; see Table 1). By contrast, CYPC19-W212X (African and Asian), EPHX1-W97X (Asian and Hispanic) and OAS2-W720X (African and European) were detected in some populations but not in others. In addition, there were three X-SNPs that were found exclusively in one population: FUT2-R297X and LCE5A-R79X in Asian and LIG4-W46X in African samples. Either different selection in different populations or the occurrence of founder effect/genetic drift may explain the population spectrum of these SNPs [16,41].

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have evaluated SNPs that introduce PTCs in the human genome that can potentially affect the stability of transcripts and their protein products. Although there is considerable information regarding the PTC-creating mutations in human genetic diseases, to date, there has been no systematic study reporting on the PTC-causing polymorphisms in the human genome and their evolutionary and biological roles in humans. Our results indicated that the allelic frequencies of the disease-causing PTC-creating mutations and polymorphisms display a marked difference. These X-SNPs were found in a variety of proteins with different cellular functions (signal transduction, DNA repair, transcription, immune response, drug metabolism etc; Table 1). A search of literature reports and the Human Gene Mutation Database[42] showed that a fraction of these genes have already been implicated in human diseases: AGT in essential hypertension; [43]HPS4 in Hermansky - Pudlak syndrome type 4;[44]LPL in disorders of lipoprotein metabolism;[45] and TLR5 in pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila [46]. In the latter case, the TLR5-R392X SNP was functionally characterised and found to be defective in flagellin signalling and associated with the pneumonia susceptibility [46]. In the case of the TAP2-Q687X SNP, TAP2-Q687 was reported to be a part of a haplotype associated with a reduced risk of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in a small sample set [47]. Our data suggest a potential deleterious effect for X-SNPs identified in this study; however, their true biological consequences and potential roles in human disease and health have yet to be experimentally verified and identified.

Electronic database information

BLAST: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/. BLAST against gene transcripts: http://lpgws.nci.nih.gov:80/perl/blast2/. dbSNP: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/. Entrez Gene: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=gene. GenBank: http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/Genbank/. Human Gene Mutation Database: http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/hgmd0.html.
  46 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources.

Authors:  K D Pruitt; D R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A mechanism for exon skipping caused by nonsense or missense mutations in BRCA1 and other genes.

Authors:  H X Liu; L Cartegni; M Q Zhang; A R Krainer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  SNPs, protein structure, and disease.

Authors:  Z Wang; J Moult
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Prediction of deleterious human alleles.

Authors:  S Sunyaev; V Ramensky; I Koch; W Lathe; A S Kondrashov; P Bork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Defective folding and rapid degradation of mutant proteins is a common disease mechanism in genetic disorders.

Authors:  N Gregersen; P Bross; M M Jørgensen; T J Corydon; B S Andresen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 7.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms as tools in human genetics.

Authors:  I C Gray; D A Campbell; N K Spurr
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  GenBank: update.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; David L Wheeler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: terminating erroneous gene expression.

Authors:  Kristian E Baker; Roy Parker
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI.

Authors:  Donna Maglott; Jim Ostell; Kim D Pruitt; Tatiana Tatusova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  19 in total

1.  Non-synonymous polymorphisms in candidate gene associated with growth traits in Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus, Rafinesque, 1818).

Authors:  Diana Suárez-Salgado; Gaspar Manuel Parra-Bracamonte; Flaviano Benavides-González; Isidro O Montelongo Alfaro; Ana María Sifuentes Rincón; Victor Ricardo Moreno-Medina; Xochitl Fabiola De la Rosa-Reyna
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Genetic variants of BIRC3 and NRG1 in the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway are associated with non-small cell lung cancer survival.

Authors:  Dongfang Tang; Hongliang Liu; Yuchen Zhao; Danwen Qian; Sheng Luo; Edward F Patz; Li Su; Sipeng Shen; David C ChristianI; Wen Gao; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Nonsense suppression therapies in human genetic diseases.

Authors:  Patrícia Martins-Dias; Luísa Romão
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  The link of ERCC2 rs13181 and ERCC4 rs2276466 polymorphisms with breast cancer in the Bangladeshi population.

Authors:  Shaid All Sahaba; Mohammad Abdur Rashid; Md Saiful Islam; Noor Ahmed Nahid; Mohd Nazmul Hasan Apu; Taposhi Nahid Sultana; Nusrat Islam Chaity; Md Mehedi Hasan; Mohammad Safiqul Islam
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  A genome-wide survey of the prevalence and evolutionary forces acting on human nonsense SNPs.

Authors:  Bryndis Yngvadottir; Yali Xue; Steve Searle; Sarah Hunt; Marcos Delgado; Jonathan Morrison; Pamela Whittaker; Panos Deloukas; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Novel SCN5A variants identified in a group of Iranian Brugada syndrome patients.

Authors:  Taraneh Ghaffari; Naser Mirhosseini Motlagh; Abdolreza Daraei; Majid Tafrihi; Mehrdad Saravi; Davood Sabour
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.410

7.  RNA-Seq approach for genetic improvement of meat quality in pig and evolutionary insight into the substrate specificity of animal carbonyl reductases.

Authors:  Won Yong Jung; Seul Gi Kwon; Minky Son; Eun Seok Cho; Yuno Lee; Jae Hwan Kim; Byeong-Woo Kim; Da Hye Park; Jung Hye Hwang; Tae Wan Kim; Hwa Choon Park; Beom Young Park; Jong-Soon Choi; Kwang Keun Cho; Ki Hwa Chung; Young Min Song; Il Suk Kim; Sang Keun Jin; Doo Hwan Kim; Seung-Won Lee; Keun Woo Lee; Woo Young Bang; Chul Wook Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genome-wide survey of allele-specific splicing in humans.

Authors:  Victoria Nembaware; Bukiwe Lupindo; Katherine Schouest; Charles Spillane; Konrad Scheffler; Cathal Seoighe
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Protein interactions in human genetic diseases.

Authors:  Benjamin Schuster-Böckler; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Functional analysis of deep intronic SNP rs13438494 in intron 24 of PCLO gene.

Authors:  Seunghee Seo; Kanako Takayama; Kyosuke Uno; Kazutaka Ohi; Ryota Hashimoto; Daisuke Nishizawa; Kazutaka Ikeda; Norio Ozaki; Toshitaka Nabeshima; Yoshiaki Miyamoto; Atsumi Nitta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.