Literature DB >> 16593559

Kin discrimination by worker honey bees in genetically mixed groups.

M D Breed1, L Butler, T M Stiller.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that in a genetically mixed assemblage of worker honey bees, individual workers would behave differently toward unfamiliar sisters than toward unfamiliar nonsisters. Groups of worker honey bees of mixed genetic composition were assembled by collecting pupae from separate colonies and placing the worker bees together on eclosion. A total of 10 workers, 5 from each of two kin groups, were used to form each group. When the workers were 5 days old, a worker of one of the two kin groups was introduced into the mixed group. This worker had previously been held in a group of its sisters, without contact with queen or nonsister bees. The interactions with the introduced bee indicate that in a mixed kin group, individual workers learn the composite identity of the group and do not attack unfamiliar bees differentially on the basis of kinship. However, kinship does influence the total number of interactions in which an introduced bee engages when placed in a genetically mixed group; bees interacted significantly more often with sisters than with nonsisters. There was a trend for bees to be involved in more feeding interactions with sisters. This finding indicates an ability of a bee to learn and use its own cues. In mixed groups, each bee maintains its genotypically correlated identity; the bees' odors do not comingle into a "group" or "gestalt" odor. The significance of these results is discussed in light of the genetic structure of natural colonies of honey bees.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 16593559      PMCID: PMC397706          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.9.3058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  The defence of the honeybee community.

Authors:  C R RIBBANDS
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1954-09-27

2.  The origin of the odours by which honeybees distinguish their companions.

Authors:  H KALMUS; C R RIBBANDS
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1952-08-27

3.  Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants.

Authors:  N F Carlin; B Hölldobler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honeybees.

Authors:  M D Breed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Collective cues as a basis for nestmate recognition in polygynous leptothoracine ants.

Authors:  R J Stuart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential Sharing of Chemical Cues by Social Parasites Versus Social Mutualists in a Three-Species Symbiosis.

Authors:  Virginia J Emery; Neil D Tsutsui
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  The ontogeny of kin discrimination cues in the honey bee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  M D Breed; T M Stiller; M J Moor
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Honeybee nestmate recognition: Effects of queen fecal pheromones.

Authors:  M D Breed; T M Stiller; M S Blum; R E Page
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Extractable hydrocarbons and kin recognition in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; R A Metcalf; R L Metcalf; E H Erickson; R L Lampman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Comb wax mediates the acquisition of nest-mate recognition cues in honey bees.

Authors:  M D Breed; K R Williams; J H Fewell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Queen-signal modulation of worker pheromonal composition in honeybees.

Authors:  Tamar Katzav-Gozansky; Raphaël Boulay; Victoria Soroker; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Variability of chemosensory stimuli within honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: Differential conditioning assay for discrimination cues.

Authors:  W M Getz; D Brückner; K B Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Recognition in a social symbiosis: chemical phenotypes and nestmate recognition behaviors of neotropical parabiotic ants.

Authors:  Virginia J Emery; Neil D Tsutsui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modulation of social interactions by immune stimulation in honey bee, Apis mellifera, workers.

Authors:  F-J Richard; A Aubert; C M Grozinger
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.