Literature DB >> 16593008

Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honeybees.

M D Breed1.   

Abstract

A honeybee queen is usually attacked if she is placed among the workers of a colony other than her own. This rejection occurs even if environmental sources of odor, such as food, water, and genetic origin of the workers, are kept constant in laboratory conditions. The genetic similarity of queens determines how similar their recognition characteristics are; inbred sister queens were accepted in 35% of exchanges, outbred sister queens in 12%, and nonsister queens in 0%. Carbon dioxide narcosis results in worker honeybees accepting nonnestmate queens. A learning curve is presented, showing the time after narcosis required by workers to learn to recognize a new queen. In contrast, worker transfers result in only a small percentage of the workers being rejected. The reason for the difference between queens and workers may be because of worker and queen recognition cues having different sources.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16593008      PMCID: PMC319404          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.4.2635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  The origin of the odours by which honeybees distinguish their companions.

Authors:  H KALMUS; C R RIBBANDS
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1952-08-27

2.  Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition.

Authors:  L Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Effects of CO 2 and pH on neuronal membranes.

Authors:  A M Brown
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1972 Sep-Oct

4.  Aggressive behavior of Apis mellifera L. workers towards introduced queens. II. Role of the mandibular gland contents of the queen in releasing aggressive behavior.

Authors:  R P Yadava; M V Smith
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.597

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Preimaginal learning as a basis of colony-brood recognition in the ant Cataglyphis cursor.

Authors:  M Isingrini; A Lenoir; P Jaisson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Ragna Franz; Anne-Katrin Eggert; Josef K Müller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The ontogeny of kin discrimination cues in the honey bee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  M D Breed; T M Stiller; M J Moor
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Honeybee nestmate recognition: Effects of queen fecal pheromones.

Authors:  M D Breed; T M Stiller; M S Blum; R E Page
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Extractable hydrocarbons and kin recognition in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; R A Metcalf; R L Metcalf; E H Erickson; R L Lampman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Kin discrimination by worker honey bees in genetically mixed groups.

Authors:  M D Breed; L Butler; T M Stiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Nestmate recognition cues in laboratory and field colonies ofSolenopsis invicta buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) : Effect of environment and role of cuticular hydrocarbons.

Authors:  M S Obin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Variability of chemosensory stimuli within honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: Differential conditioning assay for discrimination cues.

Authors:  W M Getz; D Brückner; K B Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.626

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.