Literature DB >> 27130488

Differential Sharing of Chemical Cues by Social Parasites Versus Social Mutualists in a Three-Species Symbiosis.

Virginia J Emery1, Neil D Tsutsui2.   

Abstract

Chemical recognition systems are crucial for maintaining the unity of social insect colonies. It has been proposed that colonies form a common chemical signature, called the gestalt odor, which is used to distinguish colony members and non-members. This chemical integration is achieved actively through social interactions such as trophallaxis and allogrooming, or passively such as through exposure to common nest material. When colonies are infiltrated by social parasites, the intruders often use some form of chemical mimicry. However, it is not always clear how this chemical mimicry is accomplished. Here, we used a three-species nesting symbiosis to test the differences in chemical integration of mutualistic (parabiotic) and parasitic ant species. We found that the parasite (Solenopsis picea) obtains chemical cues from both of the two parabiotic host ant species. However, the two parabiotic species (Crematogaster levior and Camponotus femoratus) maintain species-specific cues, and do not acquire compounds from the other species. Our findings suggest that there is a fundamental difference in how social mutualists and social parasites use chemicals to integrate themselves into colonies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ants; Cuticular hydrocarbon; Gestalt odor; Invasive insect; Nestmate recognition; Parabiosis; Symbiosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130488     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0692-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  26 in total

1.  QSPR correlation and predictions of GC retention indexes for methyl-branched hydrocarbons produced by insects.

Authors:  A R Katritzky; K Chen; U Maran; D A Carlson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Concealing identity and mimicking hosts: a dual chemical strategy for a single social parasite? (Polistes atrimandibularis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae).

Authors:  M C Lorenzi; A G Bagnères
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Tolerance requires the right smell: first evidence for interspecific selection on chemical recognition cues.

Authors:  Florian Menzel; Thomas Schmitt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Effect of time on colony odour stability in the ant Formica exsecta.

Authors:  S J Martin; S Shemilt; F P Drijfhout
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-02-23

5.  Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants.

Authors:  N F Carlin; B Hölldobler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ecological stoichiometry of ants in a New World rain forest.

Authors:  Diane W Davidson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Kin discrimination by worker honey bees in genetically mixed groups.

Authors:  M D Breed; L Butler; T M Stiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality.

Authors:  Jill M Mateo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Lipid melting and cuticular permeability: new insights into an old problem.

Authors:  Allen G. Gibbs
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Wax on, wax off: nest soil facilitates indirect transfer of recognition cues between ant nestmates.

Authors:  Nick Bos; Lena Grinsted; Luke Holman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.