Literature DB >> 30787666

Physiological and Psychological Responses during Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training Sessions with Different Work-Recovery Durations.

Luiz Fernando Farias-Junior1,2, Geovani Araújo Dantas Macêdo2, Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne1,2, Yuri Alberto Freire2, Filipe Fernandes Oliveira-Dantas1,2, Daniel Schwade2, Arnaldo Luis Mortatti2, Tony Meireles Santos3, Eduardo Caldas Costa1,2.   

Abstract

We compared physiological and psychological responses between low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) sessions with different work-recovery durations. Ten adult males performed two LV-HIIT sessions in a randomized, counter-balanced order. Specifically, 60/60 s LV-HIIT and 30/30 s LV-HIIT. Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), ventilation (VE), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), perceived exertion (RPE), and affect were assessed. During intervals, the VO2 (3.25 ± 0.57 vs. 2.83 ± 0.50 L/min), VCO2 (3.15 ± 0.61 vs. 2.93 ± 0.58 L/min), VE (108.59 ± 27.39 vs. 94.28 ± 24.98 L/min), and RPE (15.9 ± 1.5 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5) were higher (ps ≤ 0.01), while RER (0.98 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.03) and affect (-0.8 ± 1.4 vs. 1.1 ± 2.0) were lower (ps ≤ 0.007) in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. During recovery periods, VO2 (1.85 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.46 L/min), VCO2 (2.15 ± 0.35 vs. 2.44 ± 0.45 L/min), and affect (0.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8) were lower (ps ≤ 0.02), while RER (1.20 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.05; p < 0.001) was higher in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. Shorter LV-HIIT (30 s) elicits lower physiological response and attenuated negative affect than longer LV-HIIT (60 s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; affective response; interval training; physiological response; pleasure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30787666      PMCID: PMC6370955     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  40 in total

1.  Acute effects of continuous and interval aerobic exercise on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in long-term treated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Emmanuel G Ciolac; Guilherme V Guimarães; Veridiana M D Avila; Luiz A Bortolotto; Egidio L Doria; Edimar A Bocchi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Comparison of Acute Physiological and Psychological Responses Between Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise and Three Regimes of High-Intensity Interval Training.

Authors:  Nicole Olney; Timothy Wertz; Zachary LaPorta; Adam Mora; Jasmine Serbas; Todd A Astorino
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher; Kenneth F Schulz; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The Impact of Continuous and Interval Cycle Exercise on Affect and Enjoyment.

Authors:  Marcus W Kilpatrick; Samuel J Greeley; Larry H Collins
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise.

Authors:  Panteleimon Ekkekakis
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2003-03

Review 7.  Lactic acid buffering, nonmetabolic CO2 and exercise hyperventilation: a critical reappraisal.

Authors:  François Péronnet; Bernard Aguilaniu
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 1.931

8.  Prediction of Affective Responses in Aerobic Exercise Sessions.

Authors:  Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Oliveira; Bruno Ferreira Viana; Flávio Oliveira Pires; Mário Júnior Oliveira; Tony Meireles Santos
Journal:  CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.388

9.  A practical model of low-volume high-intensity interval training induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human skeletal muscle: potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Jonathan P Little; Adeel Safdar; Geoffrey P Wilkin; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Martin J Gibala
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population.

Authors:  Sarah J Hardcastle; Hannah Ray; Louisa Beale; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  A Shorter-Bout of HIIT Is More Effective to Promote Serum BDNF and VEGF-A Levels and Improve Cognitive Function in Healthy Young Men.

Authors:  Qing Li; Li Zhang; Zhengguo Zhang; Yuhan Wang; Chongwen Zuo; Shumin Bo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Physiological, perceptual and affective responses to high-intensity interval training using two work-matched programs with different bout duration in obese males.

Authors:  Spyridon Tsirigkakis; Yiannis Koutedakis; George Mastorakos; Pinelopi S Stavrinou; Vassilis Mougios; Gregory C Bogdanis
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.465

3.  Bout duration in high-intensity interval exercise modifies hematologic, metabolic and antioxidant responses.

Authors:  Gregory C Bogdanis; George Mastorakos; Spyridon Tsirigkakis; Pinelopi S Stavrinou; Athanasios Kabasakalis; Aimilia Mantzou; Vassilis Mougios
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.465

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.