Literature DB >> 15284978

The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery.

James Leigh Williams1, Paul Norman, Ian Stockley.   

Abstract

The exclusion of infection is the most important factor in determining treatment options in a failed hip arthroplasty. Preoperative biopsy in the form of aspiration or tissue biopsy can be used to diagnose infection. Preoperative aspiration and tissue drill biopsy were performed in 273 consecutive patients under general anesthesia 3 months before exchange arthroplasty surgery. The results of the preoperative aspiration and tissue biopsy cultures were compared with the definitive intraoperative tissue cultures obtained at surgery. Seventy-one of 273 (26%) hips were infected. Overall accuracy of aspiration was 90.1% and tissue biopsy 87.9%. The sensitivity and specificity was 80% and 94% for aspiration and 83% and 90% for tissue biopsy. Positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 81.4% and 93.1% for aspiration and 73.8% and 93.8% for tissue biopsy. The more invasive tissue drill biopsy offers no advantage over aspiration in terms of bacterial accuracy and results in more false positives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284978     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  25 in total

1.  Percutaneous interface biopsy in dry-aspiration cases of chronic periprosthetic joint infections: a technique for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism.

Authors:  Pablo Corona; Emilia Gil; Ernesto Guerra; Francisco Soldado; Carles Amat; Xavier Flores; Carles Pigrau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Septic endoprosthesis exchange : Preoperative diagnosis and reimplantation].

Authors:  H M L Mühlhofer; J Schauwecker; I J Banke; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Zanjing Zhai; Chuanlong Wu; Fangchun Jin; Haowei Li; Lei Wang; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Wengang Wang; Huiwu Li; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhenan Zhu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Vinay K Aggarwal; Carlos Higuera; Gregory Deirmengian; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexander Gebhard; Martin Fuerst; Irina Berger; Peter Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?

Authors:  Filippo Randelli; Marco Brioschi; Pietro Randelli; Federico Ambrogi; Silvana Sdao; Alberto Aliprandi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  A M Byrne; S Morris; T McCarthy; W Quinlan; J M O'byrne
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in Medicare patients: multicriteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Paul M Lichstein; James G Dolan; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.