Literature DB >> 16575482

Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: implications for the design of longitudinal studies.

Gastón A Rodriguez-Granillo1, Sophia Vaina, Héctor M García-García, Marco Valgimigli, Eric Duckers, Robert J van Geuns, Evelyn Regar, William J van der Giessen, Marco Bressers, Dick Goedhart, Marie-Angele Morel, Pim J de Feyter, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess in vivo the reproducibility of tissue characterization using spectral analysis of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) radiofrequency data (IVUS-VH).
BACKGROUND: Despite the need for reproducibility data to design longitudinal studies, such information remains unexplored. METHODS AND
RESULTS: IVUS-VH (Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, USA) was performed in patients referred for elective percutaneous intervention and in whom a non-intervened vessel was judged suitable for a safe IVUS interrogation. The IVUS catheters used were commercially available catheters (20 MHz, Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, USA). Following IVUS-VH acquisition, and after the disengagement and re-engagement of the guiding catheter, an additional acquisition was performed using a new IVUS catheter. Fifteen patients with 16 non-significant lesions were assessed by 2 independent observers. The relative inter-catheter differences regarding geometrical measurements were negligible for both observers. The inter-catheter relative difference in plaque cross-sectional area (CSA) was 3.2% for observer 1 and 0.5% for observer 2. The limits of agreement for (observer 1 measurements) lumen, vessel, plaque and plaque burden measurements were 0.82, -1.10 mm(2); 0.80, -0.66 mm(2); 1.08, -0.66 mm(2); and 5.83, -3.89%; respectively. Limits of agreement for calcium, fibrous, fibrolipidic and necrotic core CSA measurements were 0.22, -0.25 mm(2); 1.02, -0.71 mm(2); 0.61, -0.65 mm(2); and 0.43, -0.38 mm(2) respectively. Regarding the inter-observer agreement, the limits of agreement for lumen, vessel, plaque and plaque burden measurements were 2.61, -2.09 mm(2); 2.20-3.03 mm(2); 1.70, -3.04 mm(2); and 9.16, -16.41%; respectively, and for calcium, fibrous, fibrolipidic and necrotic core measurements of 0.08, -0.09 mm(2); 0.89, -1.28 mm(2); 0.74, -1.06 mm(2); and 0.16, -0.20 mm(2); respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the geometrical and compositional output of IVUS-VH is acceptably reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16575482     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-006-9080-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  22 in total

1.  Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study.

Authors:  P J Fitzgerald; A Oshima; M Hayase; J A Metz; S R Bailey; D S Baim; M W Cleman; E Deutsch; D J Diver; M B Leon; J W Moses; S N Oesterle; P A Overlie; C J Pepine; R D Safian; J Shani; C A Simonton; R W Smalling; P S Teirstein; J P Zidar; A C Yeung; R E Kuntz; P G Yock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.

Authors:  Anuja Nair; Barry D Kuban; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen; D Geoffrey Vince
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Plasma low-density lipoprotein reduction and structural effects on coronary atherosclerotic plaques by atorvastatin as clinically assessed with intravascular ultrasound radio-frequency signal analysis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Masaki Yokoyama; Nobuyuki Komiyama; Brian K Courtney; Takashi Nakayama; Susumu Namikawa; Nehiro Kuriyama; Tomomi Koizumi; Mizuo Nameki; Peter J Fitzgerald; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Coronary plaque composition of nonculprit lesions, assessed by in vivo intracoronary ultrasound radio frequency data analysis, is related to clinical presentation.

Authors:  Gastón A Rodriguez-Granillo; Eugène P McFadden; Marco Valgimigli; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Evelyn Regar; Pim J de Feyter; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Validation of quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images.

Authors:  L Wenguang; W J Gussenhoven; Y Zhong; S H The; C Di Mario; S Madretsma; F van Egmond; P de Feyter; H Pieterman; H van Urk
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1991

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Use of intravascular ultrasound to compare effects of different strategies of lipid-lowering therapy on plaque volume and composition in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M Schartl; W Bocksch; D H Koschyk; W Voelker; K R Karsch; J Kreuzer; D Hausmann; S Beckmann; M Gross
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effect of vitamins C and E on progression of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis: a randomised trial.

Authors:  James C Fang; Scott Kinlay; John Beltrame; Hiroyuki Hikiti; Marco Wainstein; Dominik Behrendt; Jung Suh; Balz Frei; Gilbert H Mudge; Andrew P Selwyn; Peter Ganz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Histopathologic validation of intracoronary ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  R J Peters; W E Kok; M G Havenith; H Rijsterborgh; A C van der Wal; C A Visser
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  18 in total

1.  Can periprocedural hypotension in carotid artery stenting be predicted? A carotid morphologic autonomic pathologic scoring model using virtual histology to anticipate hypotension.

Authors:  A Tsurumi; S Miyachi; O Hososhima; T Izumi; T Ohshima; N Matsubara; T Kinkori; T Naito; T Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Temporal changes of coronary artery plaque located behind the struts of the everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

Authors:  Salvatore Brugaletta; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Scot Garg; Josep Gomez-Lara; Roberto Diletti; Yoshinobu Onuma; Robert Jan van Geuns; Dougal McClean; Dariusz Dudek; Leif Thuesen; Bernard Chevalier; Stephan Windecker; Robert Whitbourn; Cecile Dorange; Karine Miquel-Hebert; Krishnankutty Sudhir; John A Ormiston; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Coronary plaque composition as assessed by greyscale intravascular ultrasound and radiofrequency spectral data analysis.

Authors:  Nieves Gonzalo; Héctor M García-García; Jurgen Ligthart; Gastón Rodriguez-Granillo; Emanuele Meliga; Yoshinobu Onuma; Johan C H Schuurbiers; Nico Bruining; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Intra- and interobserver variability in detection and assessment of calcified and noncalcified coronary artery plaques using 64-slice computed tomography: variability in coronary plaque measurement using MSCT.

Authors:  Hans Hoffmann; Katja Frieler; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  A winter's tale: report from the First Annual Canadian Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints Symposium.

Authors:  Therese Heinonen; David D Waters; Peter Libby; Jean-Claude Tardif
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Reproducibility of computed tomography angiography data analysis using semiautomated plaque quantification software: implications for the design of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Stella-Lida Papadopoulou; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Alexia Rossi; Chrysafios Girasis; Anoeshka S Dharampal; Pieter H Kitslaar; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Reproducibility of IVUS border detection for carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Natasha A Loghmanpour; Brion M Winston; Mark H Wholey; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  The association between renal atherosclerotic plaque characteristics and renal function before and after renal artery intervention.

Authors:  Takuro Takumi; Verghese Mathew; Gregory W Barsness; Tetsuro Kataoka; Ronen Rubinshtein; Charanjit S Rihal; Rajiv Gulati; Eric Eeckhout; Ryan J Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Impact of analyzing less image frames per segment for radiofrequency-based volumetric intravascular ultrasound measurements in mild-to-moderate coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Huisman; Marc Hartmann; Eline S K Mattern; Gary S Mintz; Mounir W Z Basalus; Gert K van Houwelingen; Patrick M J Verhorst; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Reproducibility of volumetric intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency-based analysis of coronary plaque composition in vivo.

Authors:  Marc Hartmann; Eline S K Mattern; Jennifer Huisman; Gert K van Houwelingen; Frits H A F de Man; Martin G Stoel; Peter W Danse; Hans W Louwerenburg; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.