Literature DB >> 16574725

Traumatic homonymous hemianopia.

B B Bruce1, X Zhang, S Kedar, N J Newman, V Biousse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of patients with homonymous hemianopia from traumatic brain injury (TBI) seen in our unit between 1989 and 2004.
METHODS: Only patients with a history of TBI, who had detailed clinical information and results of neuroimaging, were included in our study. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, types of visual field defects, location of lesion and evolution of visual field defects were recorded.
RESULTS: Of the 880 patients with homonymous hemianopia seen in our unit, 103 patients (112 with homonymous hemianopia) had TBI (74 men and 29 women, mean age 30.7 (SD 15.3) years). Median time from injury to initial visual field testing was 5 (range 0.5-360) months. In all, 64 (57.1%) patients sustained injuries that were motor vehicle-related; 19 (17%) violence-related; 17 (15.2%) due to falls; and 12 (10.7%) because of other blunt head trauma. Visual field defects included complete homonymous hemianopia in 44 (39.3%) patients and incomplete homonymous hemianopia in 68 (60.7%) patients. The lesion was occipital in 14 (12.5%) patients, associated with optic radiation in 26 (23.2%) and the optic tract in 12 (10.7%), and multiple in 60 (53.6%).
CONCLUSION: Most cases of homonymous hemianopia from TBI were motor vehicle-related. Patients were younger, more often male, and had multiple brain lesions more often than patients with homonymous hemianopia from causes other than TBI. A median delay of 5 months was observed before the documentation of the homonymous hemianopia, which may have a major effect on the success of rehabilitation and driving training in these young patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16574725      PMCID: PMC2077612          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.088799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  16 in total

1.  Homonymous hemianopia. A review of one hundred cases.

Authors:  J L SMITH
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Natural history of homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Rehabilitation strategies for patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Alidz Pambakian; Jon Currie; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  A comparison of tangent screen, goldmann, and humphrey perimetry in the detection and localization of occipital lesions.

Authors:  A M Wong; J A Sharpe
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of head trauma.

Authors:  G P Van Stavern; V Biousse; M J Lynn; D J Simon; N J Newman
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Homonymous hemianopsia and rehabilitation in fifteen cases of C.C.I.

Authors:  H Savir; I Michelson; C David; L Mendelson; T Najenseon
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1977

8.  Recovery of visual fields in acute stroke: homonymous hemianopia associated with adverse prognosis.

Authors:  C S Gray; J M French; D Bates; N E Cartlidge; G S Venables; O F James
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Rehabilitative optometric services for survivors of acquired brain injury.

Authors:  R Gianutsos; G Ramsey; R R Perlin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia.

Authors:  J Zihl
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Neuro-ophthalmic deficits after head trauma.

Authors:  Sarah M Jacobs; Gregory P Van Stavern
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Amelioration of visual deficits and visual system pathology after mild TBI with the cannabinoid type-2 receptor inverse agonist SMM-189.

Authors:  Natalie M Guley; Nobel A Del Mar; Tyler Ragsdale; Chunyan Li; Aaron M Perry; Bob M Moore; Marcia G Honig; Anton Reiner
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Restoration of Vision After Brain Injury Using Magnet Glasses.

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Danielle C Angueira; P Matthew Bronstad; Anna M Barrett; Mary Alexis Iaccarino
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 4.  Post-traumatic visual loss.

Authors:  Edward J Atkins; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Rev Neurol Dis       Date:  2008

5.  Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia.

Authors:  Thomas Decramer; Karel Van Keer; Peter Stalmans; Patrick Dupont; Stefan Sunaert; Tom Theys
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Martin Heister; Katrin Aehling; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 7.  Visualizing the blind brain: brain imaging of visual field defects from early recovery to rehabilitation techniques.

Authors:  Marika Urbanski; Olivier A Coubard; Clémence Bourlon
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-30

8.  Eye-tracking-based visual field analysis (EFA): a reliable and precise perimetric methodology for the assessment of visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael Christian Leitner; Florian Hutzler; Sarah Schuster; Lorenzo Vignali; Patrick Marvan; H A Reitsamer; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Porencephaly with an optic organ abnormality in a beagle dog.

Authors:  Osamu Hashiguchi; Yuko Yamaguchi; Shinichiro Ikezaki; Tsubasa Saito; Saori Igura; Ryo Hirai; Naomi Horiuchi; Kazutoshi Tamura
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.628

Review 10.  Montreal Brain Injury Vision Screening Test for General Practitioners.

Authors:  Reza Abbas Farishta; Reza Farivar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.473

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.