Literature DB >> 16567709

Natural history of homonymous hemianopia.

X Zhang1, S Kedar, M J Lynn, N J Newman, V Biousse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of spontaneous recovery of homonymous hemianopia (HH).
METHODS: The authors reviewed medical records of all patients with HH confirmed by formal visual field testing and seen in follow-up in their service between 1989 and 2004. Clinical characteristics, causes, neuroradiologic definition of lesion location, final outcome, and evolution of the visual field defects were recorded. The associations among final visual field defect outcome, time from injury, and clinical features were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 254 patients with 263 HH were included in this study. Spontaneous visual field defect recovery was observed in 101 HH (38.4%). The likelihood of spontaneous recovery decreased with increasing time from injury to initial visual field testing (p = 0.0003). The probability of improvement was related to the time since injury (p = 0.0003) with a 50 to 60% chance of improvement for cases tested within 1 month after injury that decreased to about 20% for cases tested at 6 months after surgery. No other factor was found to correlate with the final outcome of the visual field defects. Improvement after 6 months from injury was mild and usually related to improvement of the underlying disease.
CONCLUSION: Spontaneous improvement of homonymous hemianopia is seen in at least 50% of patients first seen within 1 month of injury. In most cases, the improvement occurs within the first 3 months from injury. Spontaneous improvement after 6 months postinjury should be interpreted with caution as it is most likely related to improvement of the underlying disease or to improvement in the patient's ability to perform visual field testing reliably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16567709     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000203338.54323.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  82 in total

1.  Improved detection following Neuro-Eye Therapy in patients with post-geniculate brain damage.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Mary-Joan Macleod; Ceri T Trevethan; Siân E Robson; John A Olson; Paula Callaghan; Brigitte Yip
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Gabriele H Franke; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Altered Sensitivity to Motion of Area MT Neurons Following Long-Term V1 Lesions.

Authors:  Maureen A Hagan; Tristan A Chaplin; Krystel R Huxlin; Marcello G P Rosa; Leo L Lui
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Using Vision to Study Poststroke Recovery and Test Hypotheses About Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Ania Busza; Colleen L Schneider; Zoë R Williams; Bradford Z Mahon; Bogachan Sahin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  A Randomised Controlled Trial of Treatment for Post-Stroke Homonymous Hemianopia: Screening and Recruitment.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Elizabeth J Conroy; P Graham Barton; Emma Bedson; Emma Cwiklinski; Caroline Dodridge; Avril Drummond; Marta Garcia-Finana; Claire Howard; Stevie Johnson; Claire MacIntosh; Carmel P Noonan; Alex Pollock; Janet Rockliffe; Catherine M Sackley; Tracey Shipman
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2016-01-19

6.  Recovery of Visual Field Defect via Corpus Callosum in a Patient with Cerebral Infarct.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Han Do Lee
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2015-02-03

7.  Rapid compensation of visual search strategy in patients with chronic visual field defects.

Authors:  Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; Paul M Bays; Romeo Salemme; Alexander P Leff; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness.

Authors:  Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.

Authors:  Robert G Giorgi; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Homonymous Hemianopia: A Critical Analysis of Optical Devices, Compensatory Training, and NovaVision.

Authors:  Victoria S Pelak; Mark Dubin; Edward Whitney
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.