Literature DB >> 16572087

Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data.

C J Schonholz1, R Uflacker, J C Parodi, C Hannegan, B Selby.   

Abstract

Advances in angioplasty techniques and the development of low-profile, flexible, tapered nitinol stents designed specifically for carotid applications have made carotid artery stenting a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy for treatment of occlusive disease of the carotid arteries. During the stenting process, however, debris may be released and cause distal embolization that can lead to stroke or death. Thus, several embolic protection devices have been developed for use in carotid stenting, two of which are available in the United States. In the past 5 years, data from several large trials, series, and registries of carotid artery stenting-reflecting the experience in thousands of patients-have become available. These investigations include the CAVATAS study, the Global Carotid Artery Stent Registry, the SAPPHIRE study, the ARCHeR trials, the CABERNET registry, the BEACH registry, the SECuRITY registry, the German Registry, and the EVA-3S trial. The studies have provided considerable evidence that use of an embolic protection device decreases the incidence of cerebral embolic events during carotid stenting in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. They have also shown that increased experience with angioplasty in the carotid artery decreases complication rates associated with the procedure, even when a protection device is not employed. Although the benefits of routine use of cerebral protection have not been confirmed by level 1 evidence, a consensus supports such use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16572087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)        ISSN: 0021-9509            Impact factor:   1.888


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Angioguard embolic protection device.

Authors:  Gail M Siewiorek; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Aortic arch and common carotid artery plaques with soft components pose a substantial risk of cerebral embolization during carotid stenting.

Authors:  Péter Szikra; Krisztina Boda; Ferenc Rarosi; Attila Thury; Pál Barzó; Tamás Németh; Erika Vörös
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Carotid artery stenting for patients with occipital-vertebral anastomosis.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Kajikawa; Toshiyuki Fujinaka; Hajime Nakamura; Manabu Kinoshita; Takeo Nishida; Haruhiko Kishima
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 4.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  Simultaneous Bilateral Carotid Stenting under the Circumstance of Neuroprotection Device. A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Y H Lee; T K Kim; S I Suh; B J Kwon; T H Lee; O Ki Kwon; M H Han; N J Lee; J H Kim; H Y Seol
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 6.  Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenjie Liu; Zhenyu Shi; Yuqi Wang; Bin Chen; Ting Zhu; Yi Si; Weiguo Fu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.