Literature DB >> 19127380

Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhenjie Liu1, Zhenyu Shi, Yuqi Wang, Bin Chen, Ting Zhu, Yi Si, Weiguo Fu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and investigate the complications of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) by performing a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS: We performed a search of multiple electronic databases for RCTs containing patients with carotid stenosis who underwent CAS or CEA, focusing on studies published during 1995-2008.
RESULTS: Eight trials with 2942 patients (1462 with CEA, 1480 with CAS) were analyzed. The pooled relative risk (RR) after CEA for stroke/death 30 days or 1 year was similar to that for CAS. Thirty-day RR = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.45-1.07, p = 0.10. One-year RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.43-1.79, p = 0.72. The rates of death, disabling stroke, and nondisabling stroke at 30 days did not differ significantly between CEA and CAS in the subgroup analysis. Compared with CEA, the relative risk of disabling stroke/death within 30 days was not significantly less for CAS with embolic protection devices (EPDs). The relative risk of myocardial infarction within 30 days, myocardial infarction within 1 year, and cervical/peripheral nerve injury within 30 days were significantly higher after CEA; the relative risk of bradycardia/hypotension within 30 days and the 1-year restenosis rate were significantly higher after CAS.
CONCLUSIONS: CAS is equal to CEA with regard to the incidence of stroke/death. These procedures may be considered complementary rather than competing modes of therapy, each of which can be optimized with careful patient selection. CAS with an EPD may be appropriate in certain patients, and in general CAS should be considered cautiously in symptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19127380     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9862-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

1.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital.

Authors:  William H Brooks; Rick R McClure; Michael R Jones; Timothy L Coleman; Linda Breathitt
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Carotid artery stent placement--ready for prime time?

Authors:  Mark H Wholey; Chester R Jarmolowski; Michael Wholey; Gustav R Eles
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data.

Authors:  C J Schonholz; R Uflacker; J C Parodi; C Hannegan; B Selby
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.888

Review 4.  Indication for carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting for the prevention of brain embolization from carotid artery plaques: in search of consensus.

Authors:  Giorgio M Biasi; Alberto Froio; Gaetano Deleo; Marialuisa Lavitrano
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial.

Authors:  A R Naylor; A Bolia; R J Abbott; I F Pye; J Smith; N Lennard; A J Lloyd; N J London; P R Bell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status.

Authors:  R W Hobson
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Andreas Kastrup; Klaus Gröschel; Hilmar Krapf; Bernhard R Brehm; Johannes Dichgans; Jörg B Schulz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system.

Authors:  Patrick L Whitlow; Pedro Lylyk; Hugo Londero; Oscar A Mendiz; Klaus Mathias; Horst Jaeger; Juan Parodi; Claudio Schönholz; Jose Milei
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Update on current registries and trials of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  Sunit Das; Bernard R Bendok; Christopher C Getch; Issam A Awad; H Hunt Batjer
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interactions between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Stefano Urbinati; Enrica Perugini; Simona Gambetti
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Carotid artery stenting in difficult aortic arch anatomy with or without a new dedicated guiding catheter: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Giulio Barbiero; Diego Cognolato; Andrea Casarin; Rudi Stramanà; Elisa Galzignan; Alessandro Guarise
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Gahremanpour; Emerson C Perin; Guilherme Silva
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Carotid Stenosis: A Chronological and Worldwide Study.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Zhiqing Zhao; Yaoming Ouyang; Junmin Bao; Qingsheng Lu; Rui Feng; Jian Zhou; Zaiping Jing
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.