Literature DB >> 16567638

Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates.

Kira M S Misura1, Dylan Chivian, Carol A Rohl, David E Kim, David Baker.   

Abstract

We have developed a method that combines the ROSETTA de novo protein folding and refinement protocol with distance constraints derived from homologous structures to build homology models that are frequently more accurate than their templates. We test this method by building complete-chain models for a benchmark set of 22 proteins, each with 1 or 2 candidate templates, for a total of 39 test cases. We use structure-based and sequence-based alignments for each of the test cases. All atoms, including hydrogens, are represented explicitly. The resulting models contain approximately the same number of atomic overlaps as experimentally determined crystal structures and maintain good stereochemistry. The most accurate models can be identified by their energies, and in 22 of 39 cases a model that is more accurate than the template over aligned regions is one of the 10 lowest-energy models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16567638      PMCID: PMC1459360          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509355103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

Review 1.  Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M A Martí-Renom; A C Stuart; A Fiser; R Sánchez; F Melo; A Sali
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2000

2.  Analysis and assessment of comparative modeling predictions in CASP4.

Authors:  A Tramontano; R Leplae; V Morea
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

3.  CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; James O Wrabl; S Sri Krishna; Indraneel Majumdar; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Yuan Qi; Jimin Pei; Hua Cheng; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

4.  Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server.

Authors:  Dylan Chivian; David E Kim; Lars Malmström; Philip Bradley; Timothy Robertson; Paul Murphy; Charles E M Strauss; Richard Bonneau; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

5.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

6.  Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models.

Authors:  Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-04-01

7.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins.

Authors:  D Shortle; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Kooperberg; E Huang; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.

Authors:  C Chothia; A M Lesk
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  81 in total

1.  Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery.

Authors:  John A Salon; David T Lodowski; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Self-complementarity within proteins: bridging the gap between binding and folding.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Integrative structure modeling of macromolecular assemblies from proteomics data.

Authors:  Keren Lasker; Jeremy L Phillips; Daniel Russel; Javier Velázquez-Muriel; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Elina Tjioe; Ben Webb; Avner Schlessinger; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  A probabilistic and continuous model of protein conformational space for template-free modeling.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Accurate disulfide-bonding network predictions improve ab initio structure prediction of cysteine-rich proteins.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Bao-Ji He; Richard Jang; Yang Zhang; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

8.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Authors:  Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Ab Initio Folding.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Res Comput Mol Biol       Date:  2009

10.  EM-fold: De novo folding of alpha-helical proteins guided by intermediate-resolution electron microscopy density maps.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; René Staritzbichler; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.