Literature DB >> 16565949

Functional segregation of cortical language areas by sentence repetition.

Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz1, Stanislas Dehaene, Jean-Luc Anton, Aurelie Campagne, Philippe Ciuciu, Guillaume P Dehaene, Isabelle Denghien, Antoinette Jobert, Denis Lebihan, Mariano Sigman, Christophe Pallier, Jean-Baptiste Poline.   

Abstract

The functional organization of the perisylvian language network was examined using a functional MRI (fMRI) adaptation paradigm with spoken sentences. In Experiment 1, a given sentence was presented every 14.4 s and repeated two, three, or four times in a row. The study of the temporal properties of the BOLD response revealed a temporal gradient along the dorsal-ventral and rostral-caudal directions: From Heschl's gyrus, where the fastest responses were recorded, responses became increasingly slower toward the posterior part of the superior temporal gyrus and toward the temporal poles and the left inferior frontal gyrus, where the slowest responses were observed. Repetition induced a decrease in amplitude and a speeding up of the BOLD response in the superior temporal sulcus (STS), while the most superior temporal regions were not affected. In Experiment 2, small blocks of six sentences were presented in which either the speaker voice or the linguistic content of the sentence, or both, were repeated. Data analyses revealed a clear asymmetry: While two clusters in the left superior temporal sulcus showed identical repetition suppression whether the sentences were produced by the same speaker or different speakers, the homologous right regions were sensitive to sentence repetition only when the speaker voice remained constant. Thus, hemispheric left regions encode linguistic content while homologous right regions encode more details about extralinguistic features like speaker voice. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using sentence-level adaptation to probe the functional organization of cortical language areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565949      PMCID: PMC6871319          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  53 in total

1.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Separable processing of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  A Caramazza; D Chialant; R Capasso; G Miceli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations.

Authors:  R N A Henson; C J Price; M D Rugg; R Turner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Functional mapping of the primate auditory system.

Authors:  Amy Poremba; Richard C Saunders; Alison M Crane; Michelle Cook; Louis Sokoloff; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Tamara Y. Swaab
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  An FMRI study of syntactic adaptation.

Authors:  U Noppeney; C J Price
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Thinking the voice: neural correlates of voice perception.

Authors:  Pascal Belin; Shirley Fecteau; Catherine Bédard
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Modulation of language areas with functional MR image-guided magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J Andoh; E Artiges; C Pallier; D Rivière; J F Mangin; A Cachia; M Plaze; M L Paillère-Martinot; J L Martinot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  E K Miller; L Li; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory.

Authors:  S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  46 in total

1.  Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Broca's area and sentence comprehension: a relationship parasitic on dependency, displacement or predictability?

Authors:  Andrea Santi; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions.

Authors:  Andrea Santi; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Diagnosis of single-subject and group fMRI data with SPMd.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Wen-Lin Luo; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Two approaches to repetition suppression.

Authors:  Uta Noppeney; Will D Penny
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Functional imaging analysis contest (FIAC) analysis according to AFNI and SUMA.

Authors:  Ziad S Saad; Gang Chen; Richard C Reynolds; Patricia P Christidis; Kenneth R Hammett; Patrick S F Bellgowan; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Exploring predictive and reproducible modeling with the single-subject FIAC dataset.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Francisco Pereira; Wayne Lee; Stephen Strother; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Determining hierarchical functional networks from auditory stimuli fMRI.

Authors:  Rajan S Patel; F Dubois Bowman; James K Rilling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Inference for magnitudes and delays of responses in the FIAC data using BRAINSTAT/FMRISTAT.

Authors:  J E Taylor; K J Worsley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.