Literature DB >> 20338244

fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions.

Andrea Santi1, Yosef Grodzinsky.   

Abstract

The current fMRI adaptation study sought to elucidate the dimensions of syntactic complexity and their underlying neural substrates. For the first time with fMRI, we investigated repetition suppression (i.e., fMRI adaptation) for two orthogonal dimensions of sentence complexity: embedding position (right-branching vs. center-embedding) and movement type (subject vs. object). Two novel results were obtained: First, we found syntactic adaptation in Broca's area and second, this adaptation was structured. Anterior Broca's area (BA 45) selectively adapted to movement type, while posterior Broca's area (BA 44) demonstrated adaptation to both movement type and embedding position (as did left posterior superior temporal gyrus and right inferior precentral sulcus). The functional distinction within Broca's area is critical not only to an understanding of the functional neuroanatomy of language, but also to theoretical accounts of syntactic complexity, demonstrating its multi-dimensional nature. These results implicate that during syntactic comprehension, a large network of areas is engaged, but that only anterior Broca's area is selective to syntactic movement. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20338244      PMCID: PMC2909752          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  36 in total

1.  Broca's aphasia is associated with a single pattern of comprehension performance: a reply.

Authors:  D Drai; Y Grodzinsky; E Zurif
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The effects of scrambling on Spanish and Korean agrammatic interpretation: why linear models fail and structural models survive.

Authors:  A Beretta; C Schmitt; J Halliwell; A Munn; F Cuetos; S Kim
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures.

Authors:  Naama Friedmann; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The neural reality of syntactic transformations: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Talma Hendler; Itamar Kahn; Dafna Ben-Bashat; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

6.  An FMRI study of syntactic adaptation.

Authors:  U Noppeney; C J Price
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Dafna Palti; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area.

Authors:  Y Grodzinsky
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient.

Authors:  D Caplan; C Futter
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Aphasic adults' use of heuristic and structural linguistic cues for sentence analysis.

Authors:  B J Ansell; C R Flowers
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  36 in total

1.  Processing noncanonical sentences in broca's region: reflections of movement distance and type.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Yosef Grodzinsky; Katrin Amunts; Andrea Santi; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  How the brain learns how few are "many": An fMRI study of the flexibility of quantifier semantics.

Authors:  Stefan Heim; Corey T McMillan; Robin Clark; Laura Baehr; Kylie Ternes; Christopher Olm; Nam Eun Min; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Broca's area and sentence comprehension: a relationship parasitic on dependency, displacement or predictability?

Authors:  Andrea Santi; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The picture of the linguistic brain: how sharp can it be? Reply to Fedorenko & Kanwisher.

Authors:  Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2010-08

Review 5.  Neurophysiological preconditions of syntax acquisition.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Regine Oberecker; Jens Brauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-26

6.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences.

Authors:  Christophe Pallier; Anne-Dominique Devauchelle; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The contribution of surgical brain mapping to the understanding of the anatomo-functional basis of syntax: A critical review.

Authors:  Elia Zanin; Marco Riva; Valentina Bambini; Stefano F Cappa; Lorenzo Magrassi; Andrea Moro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  A structural distance effect for backward anaphora in Broca's area: an fMRI study.

Authors:  William Matchin; Jon Sprouse; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  The influence of semantic associations on sentence production in schizophrenia: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Maike Creyaufmüller; Stefan Heim; Ute Habel; Juliane Mühlhaus
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew Siegelman; Idan A Blank; Zachary Mineroff; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.